Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+fuel\s+injection\?\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+fuel\s+injection\?\s+$long$\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 04:06:37 -0500; There are many reasons why the cars have fuel smell problems, but the fact they have carburetors isn't the reason per se, though for a variety of reasons they may be a contributing factor. A properly; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00088.html (11,648 bytes)
2. RE: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "Olenick, Jamison" <Olenick@ssims.nci.nih.gov>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:38:45 -0500; I am not sure where you are getting these figures but you can convert to a Holley TBI system for $700-1000 new. I bought mine for a touch over $300 (used) (right around the price of a decent carb); /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00089.html (7,529 bytes)
3. Fw: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:53:58 -0500; If you do all that I suggested, or buy a complete system from a wrecked car. I'm curious as to how much real world gains you're going to get, if any, over a carb / manifold swap. I'm not familiar wit; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00095.html (7,710 bytes)
4. Re: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: Cecil4by4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:10:06 EST; anyone ever thought about turbos? You get better mileage and one heck of a lot of serious horses for the money, in fact the lower the compression the better it works Bill Deer Park WA.; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00101.html (7,224 bytes)
5. RE: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "Olenick, Jamison" <Olenick@ssims.nci.nih.gov>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:21:42 -0500; I am sure that some have thought about Turbos but reconsidered. Some of the AMC crowd have done it but it is alot of work and high $$$. I do have to agree that they can make big hp. gains. You also; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00102.html (8,069 bytes)
6. RE: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "Olenick, Jamison" <Olenick@ssims.nci.nih.gov>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:31:23 -0500; I agree that if you want to go to a multiport setup (for the 75's) you could get a complete system out of a Mustang 5.0 or similar. As for the AMC...there is nothing available (stock that is), altho; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00103.html (8,579 bytes)
7. Re: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "George Schiro" <gschiro@lni.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:58:51 -0500; There is a web site where a fellow has installed twin turbos on an AMC 360 in a AMX. The engine can certainly handle the power if you swap in a forged 401 crank and ring the block. A 401 would be eve; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00104.html (8,283 bytes)
8. Fw: Why fuel injection? (long) (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 12:35:30 -0500; OK. I mainly responded to the myth you posted that FI was in and of itself superior to a properly applied carb. Take away the electronics, and with a relatively inexpensive system you have a poor run; /html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00109.html (8,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]