Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wind\s+Tunnel\s+Testing\s+in\s+the\s+Bay\s+Area\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wind\s+Tunnel\s+Testing\s+in\s+the\s+Bay\s+Area\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Wind Tunnel Testing in the Bay Area (score: 1): Author: Henry Deaton <hdeaton@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:52:16 -0800; It just so happens that we have a small wind tunnel where I work, Davis Instruments. It's mainly used to calibrate our anemometers and for new product r&d. I think the area where you do the testing i; /html/land-speed/2002-03/msg00296.html (7,546 bytes)
2. Re: Wind Tunnel Testing in the Bay Area (score: 1): Author: Rick Hammond <r.hammond@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 22:26:53 -0500; Hi Henry, I'll let others go on the drag question, but I have one myself; I've seen mention of wind tunnels going up to 90mph etc. Would it be valid to extrapolate for the higher speeds or do the thi; /html/land-speed/2002-03/msg00297.html (8,139 bytes)
3. Re: Wind Tunnel Testing in the Bay Area (score: 1): Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 08:10:22 -0500; Don't think there are any sub-sonic tunnels that run much over 150 MPH. So I would assume a 90 MPH tunnel would still give pertinent and usefull data. JB -- Original Message -- From: "Rick Hammond" <; /html/land-speed/2002-03/msg00302.html (8,773 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]