- 1. Windscreen rubber (score: 1)
- Author: SDviewpnt@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:49:04 EST
- << i guarantee you the it is correct, at least as far as the way the factory fitted the seals, for the seal to face to the rear of the car. >> Hi All, We just got done reworking the windscreen on our
- /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00067.html (7,904 bytes)
- 2. Re: Windscreen rubber (score: 1)
- Author: "MICHAEL VIRR" <virrmj@prodigy.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:31:21 -0500
- Windscreen rubber styles must be historic. I bought my first Morgan 4/4 series II in 1960, that ended up with a MG Tc (XPAG) engine. I rebuilt a car for competion in 1963 with the 1,500cc ford unit,
- /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00068.html (9,135 bytes)
- 3. Re: Windscreen rubber (score: 1)
- Author: "David Vodden" <david@dvodden.plus.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:06:45 -0000
- ON my 1992 plus4 the rubber pionts forward and lays across the top of the scuttle, as it does on all of the modern Morgans I have seen. There is a supplimentary seal under the screen, more like squas
- /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00071.html (10,235 bytes)
- 4. Re: Windscreen rubber (score: 1)
- Author: SDviewpnt@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 10:19:46 EST
- << If the rubber were to point to the rear it would obscure the demister slots in the scuttle. >> That sounds like a feature was added in the 36 years between my '56 and your '92. Is that POSSIBLE??
- /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00072.html (7,037 bytes)
- 5. Re: Windscreen rubber (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:30:49 -0800
- Late model +8 cars use a new and different style of seal. Greg Solow -- Original Message -- From: "David Vodden" <david@dvodden.plus.com> To: "MICHAEL VIRR" <virrmj@prodigy.net> Cc: <morgans@autox.te
- /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00075.html (11,178 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu