Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Worcester\s+Telegram\s+\&\s+Gazette\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Rich" <mudfly@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 19:13:34 -0400
This is a column that appeared in the Worcester MA Gazette Sunday concerning the death of Adam Petty and autoracing in general. I encourage you to send your reactions to the author http://www.telegra
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00079.html (7,636 bytes)

2. RE: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:30:43 -0700
Call me nuts, but I can appreciate the author's point of view. Katie
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00080.html (8,264 bytes)

3. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 19:38:18 -0400
John Gearan apparently had that double shot of cappuccino just before he submitted is article. Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net -- Original Message -- concerning
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00081.html (8,168 bytes)

4. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 17:41:39 -0700
While there may be a valid point or two somewhere in there, I don't think this guy hasn't a clue what racing is about. And taking the position of speaking for the Petty women is outrageous - no way h
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00082.html (9,096 bytes)

5. RE: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 17:51:15 PDT
Makes sense. Of course, to be consistent, people shouldn't smoke, drink, fly, sail, climb, run, ride horses, cheat on their SO's, or go hunting with Bob Knight, either. Then what fun would life be? K
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00083.html (9,750 bytes)

6. RE: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 18:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
The morale of the story should be: "let's make racing safer through absorbent, rather than concrete, walls" rather than let's get rid of autoracing. __________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00087.html (10,702 bytes)

7. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Healy" <mapman1138@interaccess.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:38:17 -0500
You're nuts! ;o) I can appreciate the author's POV, too - but until somebody can show me how to judge when risk is acceptable and when it's not, I'm gonna call the article what it is: Useless Hand-Wr
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00090.html (9,131 bytes)

8. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: Jim Ourand <sojim@home.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 23:12:58 -0700
Frankly, I found the article to be abrasive, sarcastic, opinionated and insensitive to the feelings for motorsports fans; but then I am an avid NASCAR and motorsports fan. Even here in San Diego, our
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00096.html (8,602 bytes)

9. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 07:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
I read the article. Is this guy familiar with the expression "never speak ill of the dead"? Beyond that, the article is in pretty poor taste. And it's obvious the author knows jack $#!+ about motorsp
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00102.html (10,592 bytes)

10. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:23:52 -0500
In this country we seem to make an art out of "knee jerk" reactions. This is a great example. -Brad (#31 FSP)
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00103.html (8,110 bytes)

11. RE: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: Jeffrey Blankenship <jblanken@amdocs.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:25:25 -0500
Okay, I'll bite. You're nuts. Now sell Lucy to me. I won't take advantage of any past errors in judgement leading to your poor choice of automobiles. I promise I'll give you enough for her so you ca
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00105.html (10,164 bytes)

12. Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: The Narbys <narby@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 11:44:05 -0500
Most people did not react postively to this guy. If you wanna have some fun, try this website to see the reaction to the column: http://thediner.eworcester.com/webx/cgi-bin/WebX?128@35.0AJbaqxfbH4^3@
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00118.html (8,324 bytes)

13. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 19:42:05 -0500
is a great example. I can beat that. Two light planes managed to collide over Saint Paul. The first reaction of one of our Council members? "Maybe we should close the airport." Phil Ethier Saint Paul
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00136.html (8,412 bytes)

14. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: "Ron N." <nottingham@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 21:25:04 -0400
This The Maybe they need to send that "reporter" (I use the term loosely) to Dalton. We'd tar and feather the sap down here. Speaking of light aircraft, a few years ago, a fellow was doing aerobatic
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00138.html (9,008 bytes)

15. RE: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: Jeffrey Blankenship <jblanken@amdocs.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:17:41 -0500
Hmmm, since it appears my post might be misunderstood, I thought I'd try to clarify a bit. I'm not entirely sure which part of the Gearan column Katie was sympathetic with, but I'm pretty sure it was
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00147.html (13,128 bytes)

16. Re: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Carson <mcars@vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:44:34 -0400
I recently got my pilot's license, and I remember from my training that you are not allowed to do aerobatic flight over populated areas. In addition, you must be at least 3000 feet above the ground
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00160.html (8,560 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu