Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Word\s+of\s+Warning\-\-There\'s\s+More\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Word\s+of\s+Warning\-\-There\'s\s+More\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Word of Warning--There's More (score: 1): Author: "Dan Eiland" <deiland1@elp.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:17:57 -0600; Found this on the Revolution wheels web site: Recommended Torque Specs 3/8" UNF 35 to 40 ft/lbs 7/16" UNF 50 to 55 ft/lbs 1/2" UNF 65 to 70 ft/lbs 12mm 65 to 70 ft/lbs 14mm 75 to 85 ft/lbs Note: Thes; /html/tigers/2004-06/msg00169.html (7,245 bytes)
2. RE: Word of Warning--There's More (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:21:11 -0300; Fellow Tiger nuts: May I add a humble opinion to these apparent "low-ball" wheel stud/nut torque specs: There is more happening here than just applying enough torque to keep the wheels on the hubs un; /html/tigers/2004-06/msg00170.html (7,933 bytes)
3. Re: Word of Warning--There's More (score: 1): Author: Fhsloth3@cs.com; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:00:20 EDT; Let's not forget that the studs are probably 35-40 years old, with who knows how many times nuts have been tightened on them. I have broken two studs by being overzealous with a wrench. Fred Baum 947; /html/tigers/2004-06/msg00186.html (6,599 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]