Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*World\s+Records\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*World\s+Records\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

21. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "Ed Van Scoy" <edvs@uswest.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:23:37 -0700; OK, that makes sense to me also.........Does that mean you have to pay Glen & Dan's airfare to certify timing and rules? ;-) Ed /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/land-speed/2001-03/msg00384.html (8,412 bytes)
22. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "Ed Van Scoy" <edvs@uswest.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:36:00 -0700; No I haven't run Big Bend. There are problems with politics there ( and a new promoter this year) and quite frankley, don't want to get involved with it. I've been through all that before with the Si; /html/land-speed/2001-03/msg00385.html (8,233 bytes)
23. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 22:10:08 EST; Ed, But do those open road cars conform to the rule book. I think several people have cars that could go faster if the could just change something Mike /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list; /html/land-speed/2001-03/msg00411.html (6,727 bytes)
24. RE: World records (score: 1): Author: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:19:43 -0700; You're right as far as aero drag is concerned, but for normally aspirated engines anyway, they loose their ability to produce power faster than aero drag goes down. Speed at altitude is definitely mo; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00371.html (10,058 bytes)
25. World records (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:54:56 -0500; Wouldn't you think that to get FIA recognition that you would have to have a copy of SCTA rules and a copy of FIA rules along with both groups with people that are authorized to make decisions and ju; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00686.html (13,464 bytes)
26. World Records (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Pittwood <MPittwood@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:09:27 -0500; Dave and the List, The FIA, as a Federation of Motor Sport Organisations around the world, cannot dictate where anyone runs for an International record approved under their regulations. Apart from th; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00690.html (9,148 bytes)
27. Re: World records (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:02:05 -0500; That actually makes more sense than I would like to admit. Our (American) speed records are all venue orientated. If they weren't there wouldn't be any other (or at least very few) records set excep; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00692.html (15,499 bytes)
28. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:26:12 -0600; Pick on Keith Day eh.....Cool I got a SFI 15 Firesuit... and a Stong consitution....( what ever the world that means..) You can call those things Wendover records if you want....long as they come wit; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00693.html (10,716 bytes)
29. World Records (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 11:49:33 -0500; "As for getting SCTA Car Classes (or ECTA, John) to be close to FIA (or even UK), I think this is a lost cause as both parties have long standing regulations and history and neither will move from th; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00695.html (9,544 bytes)
30. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:11:39 -0800; Don't go starting 12 and 24 hour stuff, man it's tough enough with the daily runs to and fro on the two courses during speed week. I like it this way as we can still enjoy what those guys across the; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00698.html (10,578 bytes)
31. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:52:26 -0500; "As for getting SCTA Car Classes (or ECTA, John) to be close to FIA (or even UK), I think this is a lost cause as both parties have long standing regulations and history and neither will move from th; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00702.html (9,444 bytes)
32. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:07:52 -0500; Don't think there is much interest anyway. JB -- Original Message -- From: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net> To: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; "Malcolm Pittwood" <MPittwood@com; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00704.html (11,497 bytes)
33. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 12:03:55 -0700; If you were to do the following, "I must admit that it would be fun to set an SCTA record here in the UK or mainland Europe that was faster than the Bonneville speed. Hmm, thinks, where can I find a; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00709.html (10,668 bytes)
34. Re: World records (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 11:29:48 -0800; List; Some years ago when Bruce Johnson was trying to enlist interest in FIA runs concurrent with speedweek he tried to get me to run my Vega in FIA production class. Since I had a 468 inch Pontiac s; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00711.html (17,449 bytes)
35. Re: World records (score: 1): Author: RAWAWA@aol.com; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:48:38 EST; A while back someone had some believable percentage losses in traction at various venues ie; the best was maxton's concrete followed i think by Mirage and Muroc Dirt and the Salt last.... Would any o; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00713.html (7,873 bytes)
36. Re: World Records (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:39:07 EST; Beckett, how about letting everybody doing it their way, play by their rules and have fun! Or must we bow to Caesar? jack; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00721.html (7,637 bytes)
37. Re: World records (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:23:32 -0500; It's pretty simple as a general rule you lose power in direct proportion of air density.. If at bonneville you have 95% air density then for every 100 hp at sea level you only have 85 at Bonneville.; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00734.html (8,262 bytes)
38. Re: World records (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:38:34 -0500; Whoops.. should read , if you have 85% air density then for every 100 hp at sea level you only have 85 at Bonneville.. Little typo.. they put the 9 too close to the 8.. Dave; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00735.html (8,646 bytes)
39. Re: World records (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:44:00 -0600; Dave what ya think.... we could get the worlds keyboard companies to change that I think... all we need is a study to make sure there are no Speckled , yellow ring necked Woodpeckers around it and aw; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00737.html (9,741 bytes)
40. Fw: World records (score: 1): Author: "Marge and/or Dave Thomssen" <mdthom@radiks.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:03:58 -0600; You can tell it is winter by the bench racing taking place on the chat line recently.Here's my two cents worth. Wind resistance also reduces in direct proportion of air density. So it wouldn't make; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00740.html (9,647 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2]