Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wow\,\s+eBay\s+item\.\s+\(car\s+reg\.\s+year\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:21:30 -0800
And what a JOY that was years ago when the Calif. smog cut off was 1965. I had a Volvo 544 last manufactured in 1965, but unfortunately one of a handful registered as a 1966. It had to the the oldest
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00349.html (8,472 bytes)

2. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: AAAGLASSS@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:52:07 EST
My pink lists my Tiger as a 67 but it is a 66 by the VIN. The one on e-bay has a 66 VIN #. Lee
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00351.html (6,979 bytes)

3. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Thompson <chris@cthompson.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:56:54 -0500
I bought my Tiger in CA. B32000331 was registered as a 1965, as it's build date is sometime in Nov, and the PO talked the DMV into registering as a '65 to beat the smog law. Did it with TBON. He also
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00356.html (7,675 bytes)

4. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:14:51 -0800
I believe CA (Distributor driven) is also a Rootes Roadster. I wouldn't sweat that. No use opening a can of worms when the '65 year model is the important number, and that was done. Normally, a Nove
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00359.html (8,217 bytes)

5. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:14:28 -0800
as except, and now it must me '65 or you must have year model working pollution equipment and periodic inspections.<<< Steve, Are you refering to Calif. smog laws? The reason I ask is I was just rea
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00363.html (7,878 bytes)

6. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: "bob josten" <bobjosten@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:58:21 -0800
Hi Tom and Steve, I think Tom is correct in that the rolling 30 year (not 25) exemption is being replaced with the new rule that only pre-1976 cars are exempt. There was a bit of tussling over this n
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00365.html (8,577 bytes)

7. Re: Wow, eBay item. (car reg. year) (score: 1)
Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:28:17 EST
It's 76 and on. Have letter from author of bill stating this. It also goes after show cars and cars from 76 on with collector car insurance but leaves the 76 daily driver for the most part unmolested
/html/tigers/2004-12/msg00367.html (7,186 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu