Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XPAG\s+camshaft\s+\&\s+lifters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XPAG\s+camshaft\s+\&\s+lifters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. XPAG camshaft & lifters (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:49:52 -0500; In the December TSO, Jim Finne wrote of his observations of wear on camshafts of larger-than-original cam circle when installed with certain lifters. Has anyone opened an engine since reading that ar; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00233.html (6,997 bytes)
2. Re: XPAG camshaft & lifters (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:50:34 -0500; The extra 'quality assurance' steps are fine, but they don't relate to the problem (?) pointed out in TSO. It indicates that, even with perfect tappets, the design is such as to allow improper lubric; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00234.html (8,327 bytes)
3. Re: XPAG camshaft & lifters (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:32:02 -0500; What's your view of this 'problem' from TSO? The engine's performing so beautifully that I'd hate to think of tearing it down. I guess that, if there is a lobe lubrication problem, it would show up; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00236.html (10,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]