Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Your\s+age\s+vs\.\s+Your\s+Babys\s+age\s+\[LBC\s+related\s+\-\s+No\s+Tech\]\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 09:06:48 -0400
I was just perusing a thread on the MG Enthusiasts Web site (http://www.mgcars.org.uk) and thought it was kinda interesting, So I thought I would throw it out here. How old are you in relation to you
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01124.html (8,978 bytes)

2. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 23:01:00 +0000
It is interesting how having an "old" car changes one's perceptions about "old cars". I am 8 years older than my car, yet I somehow never really view my 'B as an 'old car'. Now, I *do* consider my 19
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01126.html (9,865 bytes)

3. RE: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: "Jack Levy" <jack@cocoinc.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 09:49:43 -0400
Same age as my 58 1500, 42. Jack Levy I was just perusing a thread on the MG Enthusiasts Web site (http://www.mgcars.org.uk) and thought it was kinda interesting, So I thought I would throw it out he
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01129.html (9,361 bytes)

4. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 07:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Well, my cars are younger than me (I'm an early 58 model with no rust but definitely needing some chassis work!). However, there must be some sort of conversion factor, like with pets ("How old is th
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01130.html (8,779 bytes)

5. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Dave Houser <mgs4dave@warwick.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 10:29:19 +0000
This may proof rather embarassing but, hey, I'm a registered OF! 1953 TD 9 years older 1960 A coupe 16 years older 1964 B 20 years older 1967 BGT Spec. 23 years older thanks a lot, Macy. Cheers, Dave
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01131.html (8,025 bytes)

6. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 12:01:24 -0400
More than welcome Dave ;-) Larry Larry Macy 78 Midget Keep your top down and your chin up. Larry B. Macy, Ph.D. macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu System Manager/Administrator Neuropsychiatry Section Depa
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01133.html (8,946 bytes)

7. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Speedo79@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 14:28:56 EDT
My 1977 MGB was two years and one month old when I was born (according to the ID plate on her door sill). That makes her 23, and me 21! That's ok, I like older women; my girlfriend is nine years olde
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01137.html (8,658 bytes)

8. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: "David Hill" <Davhill@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 22:25:49 +0100
Hi, OFs anonymous... My BGT is 28 years old, as is my Triumph 2.5 PI. When they were built, I was riding my 2nd motorcycle, at age 17. Dave H. Can I Telework for you? See what I do, at... http://www.
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01139.html (9,826 bytes)

9. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Gernert" <kgernert@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 17:25:36 -0400
I'm 37, and drive a 21-year-old MGB ('79). And it seems so weird to me to that a 1979 car is 21 years old! -- Keith Gernert 79 MGB --
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01140.html (8,764 bytes)

10. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 17:31:17 -0700
I'm 16 years older than my '78B - I don't consider it to be old (it's sort of timeless). I vaguely remember my father having a Triumph, but after I got my MG we talked at it turns out that he actuall
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01141.html (10,161 bytes)

11. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Steve Tritle <stritle@epix.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 17:59:13 -0700
Car is 52 TD and I am 3 years older. Steve 52 TD
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01142.html (10,085 bytes)

12. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Phil Bates <jello@ida.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 23:33:13 -0600
There will probably be a backlash for this kind of question - and for people publically answering it, but what the heck. I have more than one adopted child - and from more than one country. It stacks
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01153.html (11,314 bytes)

13. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@apphosting.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:45:45 +1000
here we go.. The 70 BGT is 1 year older The 68 CGT is 3 years older The 61 A is 10 years older The 56 BN2 is 15 years older Oops, all my cars are older than me!! Me thinks it's time to get an RV8. <G
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01154.html (9,659 bytes)

14. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: "Evangelos G. Makris" <xirias@hol.gr>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:59:49 +0300
I am a very early 1966 model. That makes me about 35 years old. Evangelos 73 BGT 66 Sprite Mk3 78 Mini Mk4 60 A40 Farina Mk1
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01155.html (9,378 bytes)

15. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: "Jeanne Blumberg" <rjb4@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:18:31 -0400
20 years older than my '53 TD. Richard Blumberg Rye, NY
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01163.html (9,283 bytes)

16. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 22:14:22 +0000
WOW! Thanks for making me feel YOUNG, Richard :-) Eric '68MGB MkII (8 years younger than I)
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01164.html (8,460 bytes)

17. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Ajhsys@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:58:27 EDT
<< How old are you in relation to your baby?? >> - - - - - - - - - - - - Sorry my reply took so long, Larry. I had to wax up the surfboard for the week. Midget 23 Hefner 50 I win! Allen Hefner SCCA P
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01184.html (9,323 bytes)

18. RE: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:43:53 -0600 (MDT)
8 years younger than both of my cars, and 16 years younger than the engine in one of them. James Nazarian '71 B roadster '71 BGT ever so slowly turning into a V8 '63 Buick 215 "I sure wish I had a ra
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01187.html (10,935 bytes)

19. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:02:31 EDT
<< I had to wax up the surfboard for the week. >> Actually, I just got back from a week of longboard surfing and bodyboarding in the Atlantic, degraded somewhat by a severe lack of waves (slow hurric
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01190.html (9,161 bytes)

20. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1)
Author: Ajhsys@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:13:32 EDT
<< << I had to wax up the surfboard for the week. >> Actually, I just got back from a week of longboard surfing and bodyboarding in the Atlantic, degraded somewhat by a severe lack of waves (slow hur
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg01201.html (9,221 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu