Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Your\s+age\s+vs\.\s+Your\s+Babys\s+age\s+\[LBC\s+related\s+\-\s+No\s+Tech\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Your\s+age\s+vs\.\s+Your\s+Babys\s+age\s+\[LBC\s+related\s+\-\s+No\s+Tech\]\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:49:57 -0400; HaHa, an elder! I'm only 17 years younger that my 52TD. -- Bud Krueger http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/ 52TD 77MGB; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01205.html (8,681 bytes)
22. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1): Author: "Craig D. Niederst" <niederst@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 22:47:40 -0400; My '71 B was born somewhere between the 6th and 11th of May 1971 (from BMIHT), and I was born Feb. 12, 1976. So I am 4 yrs 9 mos younger than my B. Craig; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01227.html (9,971 bytes)
23. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 23:43:12 -0500; I'm twice the age of my '69 B. We're both youngsters! -- CR; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01236.html (8,133 bytes)
24. Re: Your age vs. Your Babys age [LBC related - No Tech] (score: 1): Author: RO Lindsay <rolindsay@dgrc.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:25:43 -0500; I have two B's and an A but not as you might think. Please read on. I am 49, my 'mgB-gt' is 31 years old, my '308gtB' is 21 years old, my "Appia' is 41 years old. We're just all OLD! Rick; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01240.html (8,038 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]