Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*another\s+dumb\s+newbie\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*another\s+dumb\s+newbie\s+question\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 02:56:19 GMT FILETIME=[2382B4E0:01C0479D]; alright kids,are we all ready for another dumb newbie question?here it goes..how do i know if i have a square as opposed round rear wheel well?i need to buy some patch panels for the rear fenders on; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00150.html (7,525 bytes)
2. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 22:45:30 -0500; are your tires round or square? he he a round wheel arch is just that...round. The square wheel arch is 'square' On RWA Spridgets the front and rear wheel arch (well) are the same shape. Round! On a; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00154.html (8,566 bytes)
3. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:56:49 -0800; Hi Phantom, No question is dumb if you don't know the answer. Look at your car. The front wheel arch is round. If your back wheel arch looks the same as the front one, you have a round wheel arch car; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00155.html (8,825 bytes)
4. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 20:24:20 -0800; Does the arch to the fender well match the 'roundness' of the tire (RWA) or does it look more like the bottom of a 'flat' tire? Herb; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00160.html (8,600 bytes)
5. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:13:47 EST; << 77 midget, >> Scott: Yours are square. The '77 didn't have round rear wheel arches, unless someone modified it and put the earlier round arches in. Not very likely. Betcha yours are square. --DAvi; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00176.html (7,851 bytes)
6. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:19:37 EST; << alright kids,are we all ready for another dumb newbie question?here it goes..how do i know if i have a square as opposed round rear wheel well?i need to buy some patch panels for the rear fenders; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00186.html (8,651 bytes)
7. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 12:35:22 -0500; Okay, here's a "significant opposing view". I like the square arches on the later Midgets. (So call me a weirdo.) The reason that the round arches are so rare is that it was a sylist's change that co; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00194.html (9,408 bytes)
8. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:18:04 -0500; I read Horler, too, and I did not see where he documented or referenced real structural data about the RWA. I don't doubt that the SWA might be more structurally sound, but do they _need_ to be? Wer; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00199.html (10,922 bytes)
9. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:17:32 -0600; According to Geoff Healey (yes, that Geoff, name dropper that I am...) there indeed was a measurable structural deficiency in the RWA for standards purposes... WST -- Original Message -- From Jeff Bo; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00200.html (12,018 bytes)
10. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 14:27:12 -0500; Horler doesn't list any documentation, but if you look at the way the edge of the wheel arch is shaped, it comes reasonably close to forming a square tube, which would be one way to get more rigidit; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00201.html (12,020 bytes)
11. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:33:20 -0800 (PST); structurally reinforced in the rear. The change back to SWA was due to possible safety regulation changes. The structual changes made to the RWA were kept they just added the square rear wings. Dan; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00202.html (12,063 bytes)
12. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:37:43 -0500; Thanks, now I know- sort of. Was it that he thought it was structurally weaker with real-world ramifications, or was it just a standards issue that may or may not have had relevant consequences in a; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00203.html (8,967 bytes)
13. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:48:24 -0600; I suspect both. I did ask him the question...as the RWA looked so much better than the front and rear "fighting each other" in the original design (since they were designed by 2 separate teams and me; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00204.html (9,664 bytes)
14. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 15:03:01 -0500; I was unaware of this. Could you be more specific or direct me to a source for some information? Thanks, jay fishbein wallingford, connecticat; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00205.html (8,304 bytes)
15. Re: another dumb newbie question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:07:44 -0500; Thanks. I guess we could run tests. We'll need five pre-RWA SWA, five RWA, and five post-RWA SWA cars from listers. Please send them all to Emory Eye Center, c/o Jeff Boatright. I promise to give th; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00207.html (10,524 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]