Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*another\s+toy\s+\(non\-Datsun\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 10:24:43 -0700
Picked up ANOTHER toy but this isn't a Datsun and I am already figuring how to put some parts on it so it will qualify as a Roadster! Go to the bottom of; geocities.com/motorcity/garage/7836 Ron
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00187.html (7,502 bytes)

2. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 21:24:17 -0700
Well, first you gotta chop off the top.... ;-) -- Gordon Glasgow Renton, WA http://www.gordon-glasgow.org
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00201.html (7,865 bytes)

3. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 21:41:47 -0700
What and spoil those classic Itialian lines? Ron
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00202.html (8,185 bytes)

4. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: sidney raper <spl310@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 20:34:35 EDT
Neat car, but I do not think that it is a Bradley. It looks like a Magnum or Kelmark GT. They were some of the best pseudo Ferrari replicas going. I say pseudo as they were never meant as exact repl
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00229.html (8,843 bytes)

5. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 13:56:18 -0700
The one in the backround IS a Bradley and the one with the blacked out rear IS a Kelmark and yes it is a very desirable Ferrari 246 Dino copy for those of us that can't afford the real thing. Ron
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00261.html (9,337 bytes)

6. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: sidney raper <spl310@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 19:00:11 EDT
I missed that you said the one in back. Sorry about that one. I was caught by the bright yellow color and blinded! Well, I have got to try at least one excuse! Sid Raper (silently eating crow now)
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00265.html (10,486 bytes)

7. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: BERKEN@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:14:15 EDT
<< The one in the backround IS a Bradley and the one with the blacked out rear IS a Kelmark and yes it is a very desirable Ferrari 246 Dino copy for those of us that can't afford the real thing. Ron
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00281.html (8,231 bytes)

8. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 17:04:51 -0700
The Kelmark is also VW based and this one has a Ghia front end for the discs and is adjustable to boot. Aso just happens to have a blueprinted/balanced flat 6 with a 45 sidedraft Weber and twin turbo
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00297.html (8,806 bytes)

9. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: BERKEN@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 23:40:17 EDT
<< The Kelmark is also VW based and this one has a Ghia front end for the discs and is adjustable to boot. Aso just happens to have a blueprinted/balanced flat 6 with a 45 sidedraft Weber and twin tu
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00302.html (8,313 bytes)

10. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: pkort@cis.picker.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 06:56:15 -0400
Funny, I don't remember a motor like that in my '63 Ghia!? Didn't Kelmark also market that car with a tube frame designed for a V8? Paul OROC Please respond to Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com> The
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00308.html (8,641 bytes)

11. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:58:45 -0700
NOPE! It's a (gulp) Corvair! No flames please, the engine is hot enough already. Ron
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00334.html (8,617 bytes)

12. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Ronnie Day <rday@airmail.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:19:54 -0500
Nothing wrong with that, Ron. It probably uses the Crown Engineering engine/trans adapter. Crown made several different adapters for the VW transaxle and chassis including one to mate a Datsun L-ser
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00338.html (9,554 bytes)

13. RE: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: "Ryan, Richard" <RRyan@frk.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 06:47:06 -0700
There is nothing wrong with Corvairs. When we raced our 2000 in D production, we had 2 Stingers as major competitors (along with 912s, AH 3000s, Triumph GT-6s, XK-120s, and other 2000s). Dick Ryan
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00339.html (10,376 bytes)

14. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Philip Erickson <philip.erickson@Agouron.COM>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 08:43:18 -0700
Which trans does it have? (coil springs - corvair early have 1 U-jount , late have 2.) torsion bars- VW trans. early no CVs late 2 CVs BTW Crown Eng. V8 corvairs used the corvair trans and Diff with
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00342.html (9,354 bytes)

15. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Jsk977@aol.com
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 11:58:13 EDT
Not only did the Corvairs eat fan belts, but clutch cables too. Made for interesting clutchless shifting. Happened many times on my brothers '66 Fitch Sprint. (See if you remember that one from the
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00360.html (7,976 bytes)

16. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Bill Elliott <wcelliot@concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 16:59:51 -0400
Time to clear up some misconceptions. I really hate to have a group of intelligent people spreading misinformation and old wives tales. (I assume you already know that Audi's don't accelerate under d
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00368.html (10,233 bytes)

17. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: Jsk977@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:04:53 EDT
First hand experience, no wives tale, 1966 Fitch Sprint went through 3 clutch cables in its first 18 months, if it had a grounding problem, it came from the factory that way. I will agree that with
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00436.html (7,882 bytes)

18. Re: another toy (non-Datsun (score: 1)
Author: William.Elliott@mail.mei.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:50:27 -0500
Fascinating.... There must have been some other issue at play here. Since it wasn't quite a stock car, there may have been some "nonstandard" problems. However, from my (limited) experience, Fitch g
/html/datsun-roadsters/1999-06/msg00448.html (9,420 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu