Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*anti\-radar\s+wax\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*anti\-radar\s+wax\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Fwd: anti-radar wax? (score: 1): Author: Beamonk@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:55:48 EDT; --part1_e2.71045b8.269f5ca4_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <david.brasfield@murraystate.edu> Received: from rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (rly-zb01.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.1]) by air-zb05.m; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-07/msg00422.html (9,112 bytes)
2. Re: anti-radar wax? (score: 1): Author: Keith0alan@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:14:44 EDT; Hello all, Having been in the radar business for the last 20+ years I would have to say that this pure snake oil. I won't go into the wavelength, impedance match, lossy material stuff but lets just s; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-07/msg00447.html (6,826 bytes)
3. Re: anti-radar wax? (score: 1): Author: Beamonk@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:26:29 EDT; I figured as much, actually, it makes no sense to me, but my big brother sent it as a joke( I got a ticket two weeks ago !) so I thought I'd pass it along. John Brasfield; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-07/msg00449.html (6,529 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]