Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*anyone\s+have\s+a\s+350Z\s+yet\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*anyone\s+have\s+a\s+350Z\s+yet\?\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "james creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:54:59 -0700; it looks very tempting after the other options ive been considering lately, but its not easy to find one to look at. thanks, -james c OSP - Ominous Season Predicted; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00067.html (7,531 bytes)
2. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "MrPepsi(Brent Johnson)" <Soloii@mrpepsi.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:04:28 -0700; Saw one on El Camino Real yesterday in Palo Alto. Probably had dealer plates, as it was parked on the street with a for sale sign. Pretty pretty. it looks very tempting after the other options ive be; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00068.html (8,050 bytes)
3. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Alan Gruner <algruner@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:59:02 -0700 (PDT); Am I the only one who thinks the new 350Z really isn't that attractive? The original Z seemed to capture the best elements of the Jaguar XKE and the Ferarri 250 GTO in a nice package. The 350Z look l; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00069.html (8,267 bytes)
4. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "james creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:25:32 -0700; my comment was that it looks like an SC430 rear ended a celica (from magazine pictures). it cant be like the original z, which appeared on the scene with double the hp and superior technology over th; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00070.html (9,329 bytes)
5. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <CMerritt@luminous.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:28:13 -0700; Not at all. I think that while it does have an aggressive stance by modern standards, it totally lacks any true style or the timeless flowing shape of a real sports car. Kinda neat and edgy and new,; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00071.html (9,155 bytes)
6. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "Paul S $#51 STS$" <ibisbike@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:08:43 -0700 (PDT); I've seen both the new Z and the coming G35 coupe, both based on the same platform. I'm sorry but the front end of the new Z is just Lame...Trucks have more personality. The G35 Coupe has done a very; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00072.html (10,406 bytes)
7. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:30:40 -0700; A neighbor just picked one up. It's definitely a classic case of too-many-cooks styling. It's trying really hard to be a little bit unique, but trying equally hard to be conservative, while also sla; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00073.html (8,845 bytes)
8. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "james creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:53:30 -0700; i think all you get with the track package is the brembos and 18" wheels and a $34K price tag. yawn. plus some "active stupidity system" crap none of us will want. as far as i can tell the only reall; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00074.html (9,923 bytes)
9. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Eljssp8@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:00:21 -0400; Now you are talking, Paul. :>) Eric; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00075.html (8,132 bytes)
10. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:34:02 EDT; so far, I'm with you... Especially wrt the front end. CHD; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00076.html (8,487 bytes)
11. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Chris Warner <jabrwoky@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:23:03 -0700; I don't think it is attractive either. But, I would not be buying the car for it's looks. Chris ]--Original Message-- ]From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net ][mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net] On B; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00077.html (9,786 bytes)
12. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:12:47 -0700; I've been hearing that a lot about cars recently. It's too bad, really. I've heard from very disreputable sources that this is the result of a redesign after they leaked their first design to get a r; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00079.html (9,238 bytes)
13. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <CMerritt@luminous.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 01:07:28 -0700; "leaked"? No no no, the first Z concept car was all over the big auto-show circuit way back several years ago. It was based on the 240SX platform, had a 4 cylinder engine and was a very scary POS th; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00080.html (10,044 bytes)
14. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <CMerritt@luminous.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 01:10:07 -0700; Exactly my feelings as well James. The track model has nifty light weight Rays rims, Brembo brakes, dynamic stabilization crap, and wing/diffuser kit that cuts the Cd from .30 to .29. Not IMHO worth; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00081.html (10,908 bytes)
15. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 08:48:57 -0700; of i have to admit you are probably right. the 360 modena is a much better looking and performing car than the 350Z OR the S2000. now why was it i was considering the 350 instead of the 360 in the f; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00082.html (10,939 bytes)
16. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:11:32 -0700; Because of cost? :) It couldn't be the look. -- <algruner@yahoo.com>, <ba-autox@autox.team.net>; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00084.html (11,712 bytes)
17. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Jake Hodges <jake@codeworm.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:27:47 -0700; Well it only makes sense. The 360 Modena is 10 MORE than the 350Z, and 3 and 6 are both more than 2. The S2000 only has a 2 and a bunch of zeros. See how none of this matters? Go drive the thing. It'; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00085.html (10,214 bytes)
18. Re: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:26:38 -0700; I couldn't find Corvette, Camaro, or Mustang. Didn't read the fine print, but it seems those should be listed! --Pat K --; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00086.html (10,987 bytes)
19. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <CMerritt@luminous.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:50:21 -0700; Actually, even more than the Maxima I would recommend looking at a sport suspension and manual tranny equipped Altima 3.5 (which has the 240HP/240ft-lbs version of the VQ35 motor). Something like 0-6; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00092.html (11,278 bytes)
20. RE: anyone have a 350Z yet? (score: 1): Author: "Kirk Meline" <kirkm@zeta-idt.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:31:44 -0700; You guys are kidding right. For that kind of money you can get a REAL V-8. Like the 2003 Mustang Cobra. 390+ horses. Terry Cambell and his brother just bought one each at MSRP. Kirk --Original Messag; /html/ba-autox/2002-09/msg00093.html (9,500 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]