Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*being\s+straight\s+here\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*being\s+straight\s+here\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:13:20 -0600; if the subject matter is going along with the content... then everything is fine... it's when we start meandering off the subject header that things get a little difficult.... First all of this infor; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00429.html (12,988 bytes)
2. Re: being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:43:23 -0500; I agree, the main thing is to keep the subject lines in order. John, Asheville, NC --Original Message-- From: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net> To: joe boogie <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>; saltracer@awwwso; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00431.html (14,895 bytes)
3. Re: being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: "joe boogie" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 06:01:20 PST; Keith; ...but if theres say maybe 10-15 different msgs on a given subject over a period of quite a few days, that's when it gets confusing-even if the "subject line" remains the same que-pasa? I.E. "; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00440.html (16,070 bytes)
4. Re: being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: "joe boogie" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 06:58:16 PST; 11-19 9:55am edt WELL DUH......here I am the proponent of dating our msgs., an' I forgot to do it.... ....mebbe its not such a good idea after all 'cuz of beein' too busy in th' brain to remember????; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00442.html (15,128 bytes)
5. Re: being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:10:16 -0600; I must be missing something here.......all my incoming E-mail messages have the date/time group included in the header in either PST or EST. If this is the case for all, then why put the date and tim; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00458.html (16,254 bytes)
6. Re: being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: "Lawrence E. & Cathy R. Mayfield" <lemay@hiwaay.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:57:23; Interesting thread on the labeling of messages. And time tagging them. This request must come from different email platforms because everytime I send or receive a message my Eudora timetags it alread; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00461.html (17,724 bytes)
7. Re: being straight here.... (score: 1): Author: "joe boogie" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:34:28 PST; 11-22 Monday 8:37 edt The reason I initially suggested dating msgs. was because the hotmail I am using dates everything in "military" time and does not give any indication (usually) of just what time; /html/land-speed/1999-11/msg00482.html (20,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]