- 1. bent frame (score: 1)
- Author: Lizirbydavis@cs.com
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 19:39:03 EST
- I'm in the process of rebuilding the rear suspension of my recently acquired '71 tr6 (now I know why it was so cheap) The hubs, outer axels, rear end, trailing arms all need attention. I just put it
- /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00104.html (7,246 bytes)
- 2. Re: bent frame (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Riddle <dunamis6@juno.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 19:52:38 -0500
- For what is worth, I always found some flex in the frame when jacking the car at most any point, other than the areas near the major support points. In general the springs hold the major weight of t
- /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00106.html (7,093 bytes)
- 3. re: bent frame (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Brinker" <74@tr6world.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:28:04 -0500
- I was really amazed at how flexible the car is when it is up in the air on a hoist. When I first purchased my 74 TR6, I had to replace the frame outrigger sections (crossmembers) where the training
- /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00123.html (7,337 bytes)
- 4. Re: bent frame (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Seaton" <RSH17@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:48:40 -0600
- Just a question, since we are talking about frame flex. Any ideas, comments, or what not would be appreciated. On a frame off restoration. If a frame has been repaired, cruciform sections and trailin
- /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00124.html (8,287 bytes)
- 5. Re: bent frame (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:28:33 -0500 (EST)
- As you have all discovered, the TR6 frame is fairly flexible. Adding the body to the frame adds some more rigidity, but not much. To answer the question posed: "should I install the driveline compon
- /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00131.html (8,571 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu