Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*brothers\-in\-law\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: brothers-in-law (score: 1)
Author: Ragthyme@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 10:52:20 -0500
By all means, bonk him in the head. I should think just the threat of a good headbonking would send him into a fair fit of fear. Corey A Fan of Bonking
/html/mgs/1996-04/msg00007.html (6,653 bytes)

2. Re: brothers-in-law (score: 1)
Author: Bill D <billd@voicenet.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:27:59 -0500 (EST)
Which definition of bonking do you mean? The definition *I've* heard has nothing to do with being hit in the head (well, unless you want it to). And it has *nothing* to do with LBC's. As a matter of
/html/mgs/1996-04/msg00014.html (6,930 bytes)

3. Re: brothers-in-law (score: 1)
Author: Ragthyme@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 10:53:05 -0500
Both kinds. 'Bonking' also means 'to hit, bash'. There's also a variant of it, 'boinking', which has no meaning involving hittin whatsoever. Corey A fan of both kinds of bonking
/html/mgs/1996-04/msg00034.html (6,389 bytes)

4. brothers-in-law (score: 1)
Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 13:41:51 -0500
Wait. Don't you mean 'bonk' him in the head? Will "nothing better to do" Zehring
/html/mgs/1996-03/msg00865.html (6,285 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu