Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*camber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*camber\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. camber (score: 1): Author: "Larry Vaughan" <lvaughan@pldi.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:43:25 -0600; I keep getting side tracked in this reconstruction process but working out the kinks as you proceed is probably better than starting over when it's all together. The '73 Spit had 2 shims on each side; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00054.html (7,156 bytes)
2. Re: camber (score: 1): Author: <ptegler@cablespeed.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:57:22 -0500; Well for one thing until you put all the weight back on the chassis, front and rear... there is no way you can expect to set it at all! Well...not true actually. Remove the shocks and springs and blo; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00055.html (8,203 bytes)
3. RE: camber (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:13:20 -0700; There is no way to know because the parts are not always made exactly the same. Plus any change in the shape of the frame and other parts due to wear, or other forces will change the geometry. The b; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00056.html (7,905 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]