Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cat\s+5e\s+vs\.\s+cat\s+6\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cat\s+5e\s+vs\.\s+cat\s+6\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: scott.hall@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:36:46 +0000; so in response to my earlier question, someone said run cat 6 instead of cat 5e when I pull wire. I figure I'm not too far in and that might be a good idea. I google, and it says cat 6 is just cat 5e; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00119.html (8,542 bytes)
2. Re: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: David Scheidt <dmscheidt@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:08:03 -0500; Well, the kid at CompUSA is likely to working at CompUSA for a reason other than he's a network guru. The big difference between Cat 6 and Cat 5E are that Cat 6 has reduced levels of interference, pa; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00120.html (10,455 bytes)
3. Re: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: Richard Beels <beels@technologist.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:16:49 -0400; think of it this way - it has more headroom. 10/100 MB speeds won't tax the cable but when you got Gigabit in a couple years, cat5 won't carry it, 5e _might_, 6 will. If the cables are going to be ou; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00121.html (9,731 bytes)
4. RE: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:40:33 -0700; The exception to that would be if you're only using Cat 6 as a "future proofing" effort, and are willing to replace (hopefully easily accessible) connectors if you do try to upgrade beyond Gigabit E; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00122.html (7,711 bytes)
5. RE: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:57:50 -0700; Which is a bit like saying a Grade 8 bolt is just a Grade 5 made to a higher standard. All it really means is that the construction is similar, and Cat 6 still meets all Cat 5E standards. Not shield; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00123.html (9,103 bytes)
6. Re: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: "Marknsuz" <marknsuz@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:33:24 -0700; Actually, not silly at all. When Cat 5 was new, the connectors were quite pricey, but cat 3 conns were fairly cheap. Same today with cat 5 and 6. You can get cat 5 connectors for under $2. It might; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00124.html (8,005 bytes)
7. Re: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: Pat Horne <pjhorne@mail.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:38:37 -0500; I was involved in the design of a commercial building's network. There are about 1100 drops, each with a home run to a central wiring closet. When the building was renovated, about 25 years ago, Cat-; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00125.html (9,519 bytes)
8. RE: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: Eric@megageek.com; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:02:17 -0400; Randall asks... I remember that. I also remember tring to network a Comodore 64 (and I still am!) 8>) I can remember wondering who needed 24 baud modems! But then again, I can remember when my mom's; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00126.html (7,580 bytes)
9. RE: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Schmittou" <rs1121@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:51:24 -0500; HE HE - we called this cat100 - I thought we had coined the phrase!! Ron Schmittou If you are really concerned about the future put in some cat 1000 - also known as an empty 1/2" flexible conduit. Yo; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00127.html (7,804 bytes)
10. Re: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: David Scheidt <dmscheidt@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:08:43 -0500; Nope. The Cat6 (and all the others) have specs covering how the cables are to be terminated, and what you terminate them with. It's usually poor workmanship that lead to problems at blocks and jacks.; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00128.html (7,761 bytes)
11. Re: cat 5e vs. cat 6? (score: 1): Author: Richard Beels <beels@technologist.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:08:10 -0400; Right. I was speaking to the A/B issue. In reading it again, I can all too easily see my misteaks. :-) Cheers!; /html/shop-talk/2005-07/msg00132.html (8,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]