Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cc\/mph\.\.\.\/\s+WOS\s+prep\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cc\/mph\.\.\.\/\s+WOS\s+prep\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:38:43 -0500; Now wait a minute TOM.... was that YOU saying you were faster ..... to funny..... okay here's what you have to work with.... 299.3 cubic inches and a record of 246.555mph... 2003 Unless your going to; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00142.html (7,954 bytes)
2. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:27:06 -0700; I bow to you...you are the greatest, I am a has been! However, my car looks like a car, not like a bullet... Anyhow the M/Ts from John have arrived and are being mounted as I write. The transmission; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00146.html (8,648 bytes)
3. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:15:54 -0400; So how do we figure this? Divide CID into MPH or what? What's the scale? JB -- Original Message -- From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net> To: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; <BWANA343@aol.co; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00152.html (8,698 bytes)
4. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:19:38 -0500; No Tom we just believe in GOD.... ( and if I was you I'd have compared this years efforts in a heart beat.... LOL... your still running a D motor aren't you? ) As for bullets.... looks like I've duct; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00153.html (9,854 bytes)
5. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: FastmetalBDF@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:43:42 EDT; Forgetting such incidentals as type of fuel used / normally-aspirated or not / classification and body style, resulting in major aerodynamic advantages / monetary expenditure / and utilization of ele; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00154.html (8,293 bytes)
6. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:52:50 -0700; The "Egg" was run by Alan Richards in 1963. Powered by a 2.8 cu. in. Garelli two-stroke and ran 56 MPH. Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00156.html (8,551 bytes)
7. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "joe Amo" <jkamo@rushmore.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:36:49 -0700; did someone say cc/mph?????????????? Joe :) -- Original Message -- From: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com> To: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net> Cc: <BWANA343@aol.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.ne; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00158.html (9,356 bytes)
8. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:39:55 +0000; Not sure whether someone ran a cox airplane motor or what.. but the below from the Bub event is outstanding(almost unbelievable!). This does read CC not CI right? TD Fastest MPH/CC: Team McLeish 23.2; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00160.html (7,786 bytes)
9. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "joe Amo" <jkamo@rushmore.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:35:56 -0700; yes, that was a remote control motor, 2.1 cc for MR Rick Yacoucci over 20 mph my original response was meant to divert attention away from Turk and towards myself............but as always it comes ba; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00164.html (8,838 bytes)
10. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:21:43 -0500; Joe you still win.... 240 on two wheels and a 1000 cc..... so you take Rick with 4 wheels and it's Very impressive at 300 +.... but it's 4 wheels.... Take any bike to include the Easy Hook.... and ag; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00168.html (8,085 bytes)
11. RE: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 06:16:08 -0400; 2.8 cu.in. that is almost 46 cc. Mcleish went 58 on 2.508 cc That is 23.125 per cc. A similar performance by the Egg would be 1061 mph.. to run at the same mph/cc I am still sticking to my theory tho; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00171.html (9,604 bytes)
12. RE: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 06:49:58 -0700; Just got back from the Bub meet had a blast the salt was very wet so speeds were down. I ran my 2.1 cc pocket bike to a blistering 22mph in the mucky salt. Derek Mcleash found a huge loop hole in the; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00172.html (9,561 bytes)
13. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 08:06:04 -0700; I am not sure what the requirements were for these runs at BUB, but the "Egg" went under its own power from the starting line through the traps. and was on four wheels in the open air. Tom, Redding C; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00176.html (8,081 bytes)
14. Re: cc/mph.../ WOS prep (score: 1): Author: "joe Amo" <jkamo@rushmore.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 08:24:10 -0700; oh hell no, seriously, its ALL good I was giving ya some crap, and I like finding fuel where ever I can................. Joe :) -- Original Message -- From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net> To: "joe Amo"; /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00178.html (8,582 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]