Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*chain\s+email\s+letter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*chain\s+email\s+letter\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: chain email letter (score: 1): Author: "scott s." <75270.3703@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:18:36 -1000; I happen to own stock in Royal Dutch/Shell, so follow things a bit, but I'm no expert. AFAIK, the exploration and production part of the firm operates as a separate entity. Once the oil is produced,; /html/triumphs/2005-08/msg00544.html (7,465 bytes)
2. Re: chain email letter (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <portermd@zianet.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:16:56 -0600; I think there was an earlier (4-5 months ago) thread on this subject. When I looked at it then, Shell actually does control direct refining and retail marketing through what was formerly its partly-o; /html/triumphs/2005-08/msg00550.html (8,978 bytes)
3. RE: chain email letter (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:25:59 -0700; I've not been following it closely, but last I heard, Shell had been ordered to sell the refinery to someone who wanted to operate it. They agreed to sell the refinery proper, but not the storage fa; /html/triumphs/2005-08/msg00556.html (7,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]