Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*chekstrap\s+question\s+\&\s+measurements\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*chekstrap\s+question\s+\&\s+measurements\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: chekstrap question & measurements (score: 1): Author: Evangelos Makris <xirias@hol.gr>; Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:33:16 +0300; Here's the measurements I got from my 1973 BGT with chrome bumpers: Rear ride height: 17.25" for the right side and 17" for the left side. Brand new Checkstrap length (hole centre to hole centre): 8.; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01367.html (8,601 bytes)
2. Re: chekstrap question & measurements (score: 1): Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 20:19:20 +0100; Well, 17" is very high - so high it is off the top of my chart. It should really be around 15" with a stock setup. I don't have a CB GT but my CB roadster and my RB factory V8 GT both exhibit very si; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01399.html (10,180 bytes)
3. Re: chekstrap question & measurements (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:40:36 -0700; Before anyone goes too far with this... is Evangelos measuring ride height the same way you defined it on your chart? The big number just makes me suspicious that "what we have here is a failure to c; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01440.html (11,255 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]