Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*con\s+rods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*con\s+rods\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. con rods (score: 1): Author: "Mike L" <renoman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:27:32 -0400; I have two 1600 motors. On stripping them down the earlier one has 1H702 and 1H704 pairs of con rods. Parts book says they should be 1H701 and 1H703. The later 1600 has the beefier 12H92 and 12H94 co; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00115.html (6,613 bytes)
2. Re: con rods (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kradicke@wishboneclassics.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:40:57 -0400; Yes, because the casting/forging number on the rod is not the same as the part number used by the factory. They are often very close, as is the case with these connecting rods... and for some larger; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00116.html (8,141 bytes)
3. Re: con rods (score: 1): Author: ksmith40@centurytel.net; Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:39:47 -0500; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00117.html (6,208 bytes)
4. Re: con rods (score: 1): Author: "Mike L" <renoman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:54:41 -0400; take numbers My parts book (and Clausinger) show a factory upgrade in the 1600 rods from the 1H701/3 to the 12H91/3 at engine #16GA 21705 (Apr 1960).Claus describes thicker webs and modified bearing; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00134.html (6,985 bytes)
5. con rods (score: 1): Author: Carl French <cfrench@cybertours.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:14:37 -0500; Should I be replacing the connecting rods also during this rebuild (whether or not I change pistons) enging has 136k on it with pretty good rebuild at 70-80k. Should I be paying to have all the parts; /html/mgs/1999-11/msg01283.html (6,365 bytes)
6. Re: con rods (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 19:42:46 -0800; Just have your machine shop magnaflux the rods for cracks and check their alignment and big-end size. If they are OK, no need to replace them. A set of new bolts would be a wise precaution, though.; /html/mgs/1999-11/msg01293.html (7,396 bytes)
7. Re: con rods (score: 1): Author: "Harlan Jillson" <hjillson@argolink.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:03:54 -0600; Just an opinion here. The 1950/2 liter punch out is a risk. The stuff I've read indicates that somewhere around 1 in 4 blocks won't take it due to casting shifts and such. The other problem is that; /html/mgs/1999-11/msg01299.html (7,389 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]