- 1. confounding ride height nonsense - hopefully solved (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:05:55 -0700
- To clear up some confusion in the feedback I have been getting (and report my latest results) this is what happened: 1. The stock Tiger springs had about a 1/2" free length difference. The shorter of
- /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00167.html (10,584 bytes)
- 2. Re: confounding ride height nonsense - hopefully solved (score: 1)
- Author: "stan gorski" <thorlp@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 17:32:37 -0400
- Tom I forgot to mention the charge for the springs at coil spring specialies was $150.00, what I thought was a real deal. Stan in Sarasota ____________________________________________________________
- /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00173.html (12,794 bytes)
- 3. RE: confounding ride height nonsense - hopefully solved (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 16:08:13 -0700
- I agree Stan. I got a pair back when they were $75 and have been very happy with them. They are very familiar with the Tiger - all you need to do is tell them whether you want stock ride height (e.g.
- /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00174.html (7,678 bytes)
- 4. Re: confounding ride height nonsense - hopefully solved (score: 1)
- Author: Jane & Steve Sage <ssage@socal.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:41:22 -0700
- Speaking of springs some more, any recommendations out there for re-arcing our modern Sunbeam leaf springs (in the Los Angeles area)? What's the consensus on how long re-arced springs stay re-arced b
- /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00176.html (7,079 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu