Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cost\s+benefit\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cost\s+benefit\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. cost benefit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:40:29 -0800; Hello spridgets, ok, here's one.. comments on the cost/benefit ratio of installing a 3.7 rear end (vs. the 4.22 that's there) or a 5 speed tranny... i'de like to be able to cruise down the freeway at; /html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00010.html (7,048 bytes)
2. Re: cost benefit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:35:04 -0500; Cost would be just a 3.7 diff. Fun would be a 4.22 behind a 5 speed. the end results are very close but getting to cruising speeds with a ribcase and a 3.7 will take some time. Getting to the same cr; /html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00011.html (7,782 bytes)
3. Re: cost benefit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 19:26:17 -0800; A 3.7 with the 5 speed is a real dog on acceleration. Depends on the tires of course. I have a 3.9 /5 speed combo and wouldn't go a 3.7 You should be able to get all you need for cuising speed with; /html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00017.html (7,574 bytes)
4. Re: cost benefit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:05:40 -0500; i'm an old fashioned stick in the mud on this. i run a 4.22 and a BMC close ratio straight cut road racing gear box in my bugeye. it's loads of fun and it performs quite well. actually it's pretty da; /html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00018.html (7,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]