- 1. FW: Crossflow heads (score: 1)
- Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 17:40:57 -0600 (MDT)
- [BOUNCE mgs@Autox.Team.Net: Admin request of type /\buns\w*b/i at line 3] Hello all: I have been unsubscribed for the past couple of weeks. We attended the GoF west in Park City Utah. Drove the 52 TD
- /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00395.html (6,947 bytes)
- 2. crossflow heads (score: 1)
- Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring)
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 09:26:06 -0400
- Todd M. et al.: I can, if you really want it, theorize for hours on the virtues and vices of a crossflow head. None of it would be based upon experience or knowldege, so I'll pass. OTOH, it is my und
- /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00994.html (8,320 bytes)
- 3. Re: crossflow heads (score: 1)
- Author: Roger W Garnett <rwg1@cornell.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 10:47:13 -0400 (EDT)
- Yup- increased flow, better flow characteristics. Actually, the main drawback of both the A and B-series engines is the siamezed (joined) ports, where the flow in & out of one cylinder interferes wit
- /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00997.html (7,096 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu