Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*deck\s+height\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*deck\s+height\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. deck height (score: 1): Author: James Carruthers <j.carruthers@rave.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:21:08 +0000; Does anyone know the deck height of a 1500? Likewise - the thickness of a standard gasket. Anyone have any experiences of using two (or more?!) gaskets to lower the compression ratio? James 69 Signa; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00042.html (7,146 bytes)
2. RE: deck height (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:50:07 -0000; I don't know the answer to your question (sorry), but I am curious - why would you want to lower the compression ratio? Unless you've somehow acquired a head that's been milled to b**y and has such a; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00043.html (7,939 bytes)
3. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: James Carruthers <j.carruthers@rave.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:58:01 +0000; You are right - I would be mad to want to lower the compression - unless I was turbo charging it... But no - it's nothing that exciting... Last easter I bought a bargain 1300 cylinder head - ported,; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00044.html (8,256 bytes)
4. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: James Carruthers <j.carruthers@rave.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:09:55 +0000; I measured the cc of the combusion chambers in the head using liquid Then worked it out from there... James; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00045.html (7,171 bytes)
5. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: Tburke4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:43:49 EST; My Gosh, James... Weren't you the callow youth who once was going to get rid of his Spitfire because it needed, what? A new engine, a clutch, or somesuch? And the the good people on this list convinc; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00046.html (8,073 bytes)
6. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: James Carruthers <j.carruthers@rave.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:53:43 +0000; I'll be first to admit I went through a bad patch... :oD I love my car now - even with its faults... James; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00047.html (7,508 bytes)
7. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: Tburke4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:00:20 EST; Sometimes I think the faults are the best part... Tom B; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00048.html (7,150 bytes)
8. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: <ptegler@cablespeed.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:56:30 -0500; James...do you have the recessed block, or has it been machined flat? In either case, I'm fairly sure the deck height to edge of the recess is zero. BUT it's also VERY likely that the actual toleranc; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00049.html (8,263 bytes)
9. Re: deck height (score: 1): Author: Tburke4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:05:20 EST; aaron, Your story a while back about the St. Louis Double Regionals reminded me of watching a friend of mine, many, many years ago, who built a nice, hot Datsun 510 on a zero budget. He was running t; /html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00050.html (8,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]