Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*digital\s+pictures\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*digital\s+pictures\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. digital pictures (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:31:15 -0700; I need some advice, which is only marginally on topic. I've noticed that several of you have digital cameras and have taken some excellent pictures. In particular, there were some really nice digital; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00353.html (8,159 bytes)
2. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: "Randy Trautman" <trautman@nwlink.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:54:54 -0800; I've been studying the digital camera market for a while and I am about to make the jump. I do a lot of work with high school marching bands, motorcycles and web sites. This kind of sums up what I ha; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00358.html (10,212 bytes)
3. digital pictures (score: 1): Author: "Justin Dunphy" <justin@dunphy.homeip.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 15:50:07 -0500; I have an Olympus D460Z that I am very happy with paid about 300 about 3 months ago. Seen em for about 239 now Check out http://dunphy.homeip.net for general pictures go to http://dunphy.homeip.net/T; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00359.html (7,334 bytes)
4. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: LBCarCoMail@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:41:40 EST; I did a fair amount of research into this back in July and due the techology only considered the 3 megapixal camerals. Of those the ones I wound up considering were the Canon, Epson and the Nikon 99; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00361.html (8,528 bytes)
5. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:34:04 -0600; megapixel resolution be sufficient for good quality desktop, 8 x 10 and 1280 X 960 pictures? .... Okay, it's a slow mail day, so why not? I use a digital camera with 1.3 megapixel resolution, which i; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00363.html (12,471 bytes)
6. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: BobMGT@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:47:24 EST; David: I have an Olympus D-400 that I bought 1 1/2 years ago (20 in digital years). It's a 1.3 megapixel unit. In my humble opinion it blows up to 8X10 as well as 35mm film (unless you're talking abo; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00365.html (8,308 bytes)
7. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: "Edward Woods" <fogbro1@home.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:54:00 -0500; My brother and I purchased an Olympus D360L about two months ago. Just under $300. Am extremely pleased with it except for the way it eats AA batteries. Ed Woods; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00370.html (7,219 bytes)
8. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: "Jeanne Blumberg" <rjb4@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 21:08:59 -0500; Buy NiCad rechargeable batteries and a charger (at Radio Shack). Believe me it's worth it. That camera really does eat batteries. I have the same one. Excellent camera.; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00371.html (7,179 bytes)
9. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:54:23 EST; - - - - - - - - - - - - - Just FYI, go to: http://www.nyip.com and follow the link to the digital photography section. Lots of good info, and the NY Institute of Photography should know what they are; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00409.html (7,911 bytes)
10. Re: digital pictures (score: 1): Author: "Dave Wood" <djw69@idt.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:23:43 -0800; Thanks for the information, that's quite an informative site. Dave 72 B Just FYI, go to: http://www.nyip.com and follow the link to the digital photography section. Lots of good info, and the NY Ins; /html/mgs/2000-12/msg00413.html (7,340 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]