- 1. downflow vs. cross flow, fan position (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
- Just got back from a 2 day conference/class on automotive heat exchangers given by the SAE, with a fellow named Ram Shah as the instructor (if you're a Mech E, you have probably used one of his 25 bo
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00127.html (9,217 bytes)
- 2. Re: downflow vs. cross flow, fan position (score: 1)
- Author: "Peter C." <nosimport@mailbag.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 08:32:24 -0500
- snnnnnorkkkk.... um, huh? Oh... yeah.... no difference, fan should suck. YAAWWWWN Thanks snnnnnnnnoorrrrrrre.......... Peter C
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00149.html (7,668 bytes)
- 3. Re: downflow vs. cross flow, fan position (score: 1)
- Author: Ajhsys@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:04:37 EDT
- << With the fan behind the HX, the flow is more laminar into the HX, and the flow field is more uniform, giving much better air distribution across the face of the HX. With the fan behind the HX, an
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00154.html (7,734 bytes)
- 4. Re: downflow vs. cross flow, fan position (score: 1)
- Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
- The "inlet shroud" is abviously a shroud between the radiator and the fan. What should this look like? On a car, the fan is only used when the car moves slowly or not at all. Wouldn't the shoud redu
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00168.html (8,169 bytes)
- 5. Re: downflow vs. cross flow, fan position (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
- The shroud should be an inlet guide to the fan. That is, it should direct and, ideally, straighten the flow into the radiator. Yes, of course there is a penalty for any gain, and any type of duct wil
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00172.html (8,932 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu