Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*draft\s+new\s+supplemental\s+regs\:\s+comments\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*draft\s+new\s+supplemental\s+regs\:\s+comments\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:27:48 -0700 (PDT); Any comments on these draft rules - my notes in square i) All drivers must stop and collect a timeslip at the end of each run. If no-one is available to distribute timeslips, drivers must come to a s; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00262.html (9,932 bytes)
2. Re: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: Patrick Jones <axng4me@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:21:16 -0700 (PDT); You can't give a person two DNF's for the same run. Many DNF's are not realized by the driver until after their run, so not stopping and getting a DNF is severe enough of a penalty and deterrent. Be; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00265.html (9,879 bytes)
3. RE: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:37:18 -0700; I would suggest we not limit the rule to cell phones. We should include any gadget (such as a PDA, Gameboy) that would distract one's attention from the course. It doesn't seem like anyone would be (; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00266.html (10,497 bytes)
4. RE: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:31:34 -0700; Patrick Jones writes... This does happen. More regularly than timing lights >get hit. Perhaps item iii might be better worded as: iii) Hitting the timing lights results in an automatic DNF for that r; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00267.html (8,111 bytes)
5. RE: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@speedracer.speedtoys.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:00:16 -0700 (PDT); -- Perhaps to re-word the rule to classify any devices on the course other than course radios and other assigned devices..to fall under cameras. A spotter must be required, and a worker cannot be use; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00268.html (8,165 bytes)
6. Re: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Lahey" <kml@patheticgeek.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:53:39 -0700; Heh, I've certainly had to stop more than one worker from going out there with a camera. Sounds like a fine idea. Kevin kml@patheticgeek.net; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00269.html (7,851 bytes)
7. RE: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: <giles@vy.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:59:09 -0700 (PDT); What if you hit the box on the other side that acts as the reflector for the timing lights? Or run into the display stand? Or run over the cable and break it? Or hit the trailer/course worker? I thin; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00270.html (9,072 bytes)
8. Re: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1): Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:05:55 -0700; We already have 50 SFR supplemental rules which almost no one reads, and the SC members, including myself, can't remember. We don't need to (and can't) codify every possible unsafe act. If we have co; /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00271.html (8,356 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]