- 1. dyno test of TR-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:38:30 -0700
- We were recently doing some engine dyno testing of a 3/4 race "fast road" TR-4 engine destined for a Morgan. We had what I thought were some very interesting results. The engine is an 87 mm bore Hepo
- /html/fot/2003-10/msg00070.html (9,754 bytes)
- 2. Re: dyno test of TR-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@adelphia.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:34:17 -0400
- I had a similar experience a few years ago with HS6 carbs. I could not get any power over 6000 rpm on the track. I just could not get them to flow enough fuel. I put air cleaners on to add some restr
- /html/fot/2003-10/msg00081.html (10,658 bytes)
- 3. Re: dyno test of TR-4 (score: 1)
- Author: N197TR4@cs.com
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:48:14 EDT
- Kas recounts some dyno work on a TR250 engine and making bigger HP by just changing velocity stacks. I am getting more anxious to check the efficiency of the ones my son Sean made out aluminum billet
- /html/fot/2003-10/msg00082.html (7,142 bytes)
- 4. Re: dyno test of TR-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:31:47 -0700
- My work with velocity stacks was always with FULL RACE engines. The purpose of the stack use was to help contain the fuel standoff which appears at the bottom of the rev scale (around 4000 revs) wher
- /html/fot/2003-10/msg00083.html (8,902 bytes)
- 5. Re: dyno test of TR-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@adelphia.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 20:16:29 -0400
- I had RC needles, with jets turned down as much as they would not fall off. I even tried drilling the jets 4/1000 oversize, but I could not make the HS6's work. I also tried various float needles, la
- /html/fot/2003-10/msg00086.html (8,603 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu