Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*electronic\s+ignitions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*electronic\s+ignitions\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: "Fraser,Ron" <Ron_Fraser@xn.xerox.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 09:26:38 PDT; I installed the IGNITOR from Pertronics several years ago, it works great. No points, no condenser, one gap to set then forget about it. Install time was about 30 min. Just remove the points and con; /html/tigers/1997-08/msg00127.html (7,591 bytes)
2. RE: electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: "Fraser,Ron" <Ron_Fraser@xn.xerox.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 15:31:07 PDT; Yes I'm still using the original Tiger Tach. I put the Jacobs electronic system in first, this required the Jacobs Tach adaptor, which in turn required my original Tach to be adjusted. Tiger Tom loo; /html/tigers/1997-08/msg00129.html (9,185 bytes)
3. Re: electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: gary_winblad@juno.com (Gary A Winblad); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:23:49 -0700; On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 15:31:07 PDT "Fraser,Ron" <Ron_Fraser@xn.xerox.com> Yes, I have the Ignitor (EXCELLENT piece BTW) running the stock tach just fine... it just replaces the points and condenser, ev; /html/tigers/1997-08/msg00132.html (7,120 bytes)
4. Re[2]: electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: nicholsj@oakwood.org; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 97 08:27:11 EST; I can verify that Pertronics Ignitor works fine with the stock Tiger tach. Last spring I installed the Ignitor with the standard coil and dist. and the tach works okay. The car ran better with the Ig; /html/tigers/1997-08/msg00134.html (9,689 bytes)
5. Electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: Larry Wright <Larry.Wright@mail.wdn.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 18:27:38 -0800; My tach is working (as well as it ever did)with my oh-so-pretty Mallory Unilite distributor, but they required a second ballast resistor to be wired in series with the first. Unnnnn-sightly! Pretty s; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00131.html (7,541 bytes)
6. Re: Electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: richards@northcoast.com; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 20:37:58 -0800; Actually, one ballast resistor is adequate..... Regards-Chris; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00135.html (7,600 bytes)
7. Fwd: Electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: OldeAlp@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 09:59:46 -0500 (EST); Yeah, Larry, they did that to Alpines, too. "Ole" -- Forwarded message: From: Larry.Wright@mail.wdn.com (Larry Wright) Sender: owner-tigers@autox.team.net Reply-to: Larry.Wright@mail.wdn.com (Larry W; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00137.html (7,897 bytes)
8. Re: Electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: Ken Tisdale <ktisdale@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 07:55:40 -0700; Does the original ballast resistor work just fine, or does one have to change the resistor? If so, what new resistance is needed? -- Ken Tisdale Sr. Sales Engineer Pulsecom 303-403-1968 ktisdale@ix.n; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00138.html (8,153 bytes)
9. Re: Electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: richards@northcoast.com; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:40:05 -0800; Not many have an "original" that still works but I believe (don't quote me on this -you can check it with a voltmeter) most coil balast resistors reduce voltage to about 8-volts. Mallory can give one; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00139.html (7,692 bytes)
10. RE: Electronic ignitions (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atherton (Entex)" <a-richat@MICROSOFT.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 23:53:10 -0800; I believe this is why that two ballasts are used with these, as was mentioned in an earlier post by someone. One for the normal run side, and one for the Start side. Normally, the coils are charged d; /html/tigers/1997-01/msg00140.html (8,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]