- 1. Re: engine life at revs (score: 1)
- Author: Silikal@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 09:33:38 -0400
- Tell that to Showroom Stock racers, or (to keep on topic) MG vintage racers. Granted, if you give it 16:1 compression and a 'one race' cam... Now if you're talking about bringing a stock engine up to
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00169.html (8,247 bytes)
- 2. Re: engine life at revs (score: 1)
- Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton)
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 11:03:37 +0600
- I thought the term "thrown rod" referred not to connecting rods but pushrods. Somebody straighten me out. -- Jay Tilton jtilton@vt.edu
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00173.html (6,761 bytes)
- 3. Re: engine life at revs (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger Garnett" <rwg1@cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 12:05:21 -5000
- Nah, I'm usually willing to let a lot of people be wrong. Me too, sometimes... That would depend on how the engine was built, and what exactly determined the redline, and if there is extra overhead i
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00175.html (11,106 bytes)
- 4. FW: engine life at revs (score: 1)
- Author: "Palmer, Lew (UCI)" <LEW@p01.uci.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 16:31:00 PDT
- Actually, what kills most J cranks (of the "twisted wire" persuasion) is UNDER-revving. Most cracks occuring in these cranks happens when the engine is asked to pull at less than optimal revs. The h
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00185.html (7,579 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu