Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*engines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*engines\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. engines (score: 1): Author: "M. Frankford" <martin@virtual-motors.com>; Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 11:47:01 -0500; I had some time to kill in Huntsville so I went by a local repair shop. I remember some 10 or 15 years ago the manager had told me he had shed full of MG engines. So as a fluke I went by. Most were g; /html/mgs/2001-05/msg00146.html (7,672 bytes)
2. engines (score: 1): Author: "Randy Rees (Starwave)" <Randyr@starwave.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Aug 96 21:19:00 PDT; Anybody know why MG never fitted the twincam engine to a B, also not that I would or could, but will a twin cam fit into a B without modifications? Randy Rees Starwave Corp. http:\\www.starwave.com\; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00507.html (6,908 bytes)
3. Re: engines (score: 1): Author: "Christopher M. Delling" <cdelling@mail.ic.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 07:35:09 -0400; Randy Ian Penberthy, it would seem that the engine was a nightmare from a durability standpoint, hence the reason it was dropped. It was engineered as a "black hole" project, since MG did not recieve; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00512.html (7,737 bytes)
4. Re: engines (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 17:55:12 -0400; << Anybody know why MG never fitted the twincam engine to a B, also not that I would or could, but will a twin cam fit into a B without modifications? Randy Rees Starwave Corp. http:\\www.starwave.co; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00652.html (7,467 bytes)
5. Re: engines (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <on76@dial.pipex.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 96 19:24:16 GMT; I would be surprised if they were factory, the engine gave so much trouble that the last few twin-cam bodies were fitted with the standard engine but different badging. Brian Laban's "MGB The Comple; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00746.html (7,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]