Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*equitable\s+classing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*equitable\s+classing\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: equitable classing (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:27:41 EDT; << The heck with the cars -- we should reclass Endicott, Goeke, Bauer, McIver...." >> This is exactly the point I was trying to make. These guys and several others I can think of are fast and at the; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01153.html (8,223 bytes)
2. Re: equitable classing (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:16:05 -0500; With all due respect Gary, this still makes no sense to me. If a car is physically capable of a given performance, you HAVE to use that potential performance when classing. If you class as you propos; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01217.html (6,951 bytes)
3. Re: equitable classing (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 18:55:03 EDT; << With all due respect Gary, this still makes no sense to me. If a car is physically capable of a given performance, you HAVE to use that potential performance when classing. If you class as you pr; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01224.html (10,665 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]