Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*failed\s+petrol\s+gauge\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*failed\s+petrol\s+gauge\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. failed petrol gauge (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:31:36 +0100; Has anyone any suggestions I can pass back to Barry, he's posted this on our TSSC Southern site but I thought there just might be a few more people out there on the lists who could help than visit ou; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00388.html (7,275 bytes)
2. Re: failed petrol gauge (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:39:46 +0100; I've just had this reappear two days on from the original posting, apologies to anyone who also gets it duplicated, just wanted to let you know I hadn't resent it, must be something in the ether havi; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00390.html (6,924 bytes)
3. Re: failed petrol gauge (score: 1): Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 02:08:41 +0100; Hi Suzie Tell him to short the wire to the sender to earth, if the gauge rises then it is the sender at fault, if the gauge doesn't rise it is probably the gauge. This test relies on him being sure h; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00415.html (7,989 bytes)
4. Re: failed petrol gauge (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 07:43:38 +0100; Thanks for all who've helped so far, this is the latest from Barry. ** Thanks for the help, I have identified the fault as the sender unit. What are the alternatives? Is it likely to be a punctured f; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00443.html (7,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]