Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ford\s+bashing\s+\.\s+\.\s+\.\s+\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ford\s+bashing\s+\.\s+\.\s+\.\s+\.\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: DavidAdin@mercydurango.org; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:42:47 -0700; FORD: The customer came first in developing the all-new Ford Excursion. TRANSLATION: We had about 50 million tons of extra sheet metal lying around. FORD: It's designed to provide customers with a fr; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00053.html (12,133 bytes)
2. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 08:59:45 -0800; A few random observations, David, QUESTION: Have they even thought to make provisions for what to do with those 10 cups of coffee, after they have been "processed"? QUESTION: All that hyped size and; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00054.html (9,378 bytes)
3. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 20:12:25 -0700; 2 inches _from_ your door? That's not so bad. I think it was Dave Green whose Alpine got parked into by a couple of inches at Yellowstone during SUNI III. The culprit was an SUV driver who couldn't h; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00055.html (8,194 bytes)
4. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:32:36 EST; And memory serves me it was a GM SUV driven by a space cadette. 'Golly is that a classic?' Suburbans are just slightly smaller than the big Fords and are just a dangerous. And GM makes no effort to p; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00057.html (8,117 bytes)
5. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: "Jerold VanderPool" <jrv309@inreach.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 21:13:04 -0800; Dave: My Chevy Tahoe SUV gets 20 MPG, sorry about yours! Bye the Bye, what type of mileage do you get with your Tiger? Jerry with the Candy Apple Tiger in Cambria. -- Original Message -- From: <DJoh7; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00058.html (8,936 bytes)
6. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@cox.net; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 09:18:47 -0500; Did someone buy a Tiger for a gas mileage advantage??? I don't get it.; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00059.html (9,263 bytes)
7. RE: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: "Allan Connell, Jr" <alcon@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 08:39:38 -0800; 13 mpg down here in Sandyeggo And that's on the freeway with the top down. I know, I know.... shouldn't have a double-pumper. :) AC --Original Message-- From: owner-tigers@autox.team.net [mailto:owne; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00062.html (9,516 bytes)
8. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: DCStory@aol.com; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 11:53:43 -0500; Now if the next generation Mega SUV gets any bigger, you will be able to just drive the TIGER up the ramps, into the back and be able to transport it anywhere in style. Don In San Dimas; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00063.html (7,909 bytes)
9. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:42:55 -0800; I get 13 in my Tiger around town. I got a whopping 15mpg on the way up to Mammoth last June. I have a 500 cfm Edelbrock on a 260 ........ and 3.23:1 gears :( Erich -- Original Message -- From: "Allan; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00064.html (10,337 bytes)
10. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: Larry Blackman <lb7777@wcrtc.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 12:52:45 -0500; So what is wrong with that?; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00065.html (8,008 bytes)
11. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:04:17 EST; Drove my stock 260 from Florida to Vermont and averaged 25 mpg. Mark L.; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00066.html (7,756 bytes)
12. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:03:47 EST; And that's going uphill! My Tiger got about 19-20 mpg on the road. That's a 260 with F4B and Holly 600 and 2.88 rear. When horsing around, who knows. Probably about 15 mpg. Dave; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00069.html (7,781 bytes)
13. FW: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: "D. E. Adin" <adin@frontier.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:04:31 -0700; Well, Jerry, just thought I would pass the Excreter piece for "entertainment" purposes - I have no political attachment one way or the other. The tow veehickle (thats how its pronounced here in zip c; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00075.html (9,342 bytes)
14. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: lb7777@wcrtc.net; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:59:51 -0500; Go get a small electric powered army tank. That should make you happy. What makes you think that it is the SUV that is dangerous? I guess that some people just like to drive the dangerous small cars; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00076.html (9,229 bytes)
15. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: SFordRB@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:05:59 EST; Sounds like the Diane "left coast crowd." As far as I'm concerned drive it if you like it. The size of the car makes no difference if you're just plain a crappy driver. Let's see, my V8 powered SUV g; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00135.html (7,767 bytes)
16. Re: ford bashing . . . . (score: 1): Author: bmelusky@netscape.net; Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:01:08 -0500; I'm a little late with the reply, as i have just returned from a 4 week trip to Micronesia. After the typhoon in Guam, email was so slow, I stopped trying to receive it except for my business account; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00158.html (8,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]