Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fot\-digest\s+V1\s+\#1246\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fot\-digest\s+V1\s+\#1246\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: fot-digest V1 #1246 (score: 1): Author: Editorgary@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:24:47 EDT; Actually, the way the bill is written, the rolling exemption is for "collector cars" which are defined in part as cars that are more than 35 years old. Which means that it will become relevant in 201; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00143.html (7,191 bytes)
2. RE: fot-digest V1 #1246 (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:05:05 -0700; years <snip> So your real complaint is that your 1976 collector car will have to pass smog two or three times more ? Shouldn't be a problem at all for a restored engine. Randall; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00146.html (6,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]