Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*front\s+spring\s+question\s+\-\s+1973\s+BGT\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*front\s+spring\s+question\s+\-\s+1973\s+BGT\s+\?\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: "wizardz" <wizardz@maxinter.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:51:23 -0400; Last summer's rear suspension rebuild on my CB '73 BGT required me to remove the brand new stock leaf springs I had just installed and replace them with 1" lowered leaf springs from Moss. The brand n; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00699.html (8,752 bytes)
2. Fw: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: "wizardz" <wizardz@maxinter.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 12:56:22 -0400; Last summer's rear suspension rebuild on my CB '73 BGT required me to remove the brand new stock leaf springs I had just installed and replace them with 1" lowered leaf springs from Moss. The brand n; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00706.html (8,807 bytes)
3. Re: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:32:27 +0100; 13.5 is very low. You might like to have a look at a selection of other peoples ride heights and mods on the web site below - select 'Spanners' and 'Ride Height'. Only two people show fronts at 13.5; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00750.html (10,159 bytes)
4. Re: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:33:35 -0600 (MDT); my 71 roadster sits at 11 3/4 front and 14 rear. this is all on stock springs. I have never figured out why the front sits so low but I bottom out on all speed bumps and many driveways. The car is on; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00759.html (11,134 bytes)
5. RE: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:52:44 -0600 (MDT); Thanks Kelvin. Onoe thing that I forgot to mention is that I bought the springs new, and they have sat this low since the day they were installed. They are supposed to be stock repalcement springs fr; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00761.html (13,569 bytes)
6. Re: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: Carl Elliott <grunt2@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 17:50:25 -0400; I replaced all the springs , new heavy duty shock valves on front shock ,tube rear and my 73 BGT sits level. springs are stock. Carl E.; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00763.html (14,351 bytes)
7. Re: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: Carl Elliott <grunt2@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 22:33:04 -0400; You might have GT springs in the rear they are 7 leaf, Roadsters are 6. Carl E.; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00775.html (11,660 bytes)
8. RE: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 14:03:35 -0600; James, sounds like the ride height when you us Moss' 550lb rate springs on a chrome bumper car. Larry Hoy; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00788.html (12,163 bytes)
9. Re: front spring question - 1973 BGT ?? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 19:48:00 +0100; 2" less than normal sounds like no springs at all! and rears. the slightly bump-stops 'stock'; /html/mgs/2000-05/msg00841.html (11,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]