Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*frontal\s+area\/drag\s+coefficient\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Ridlen <gridlen@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Does anyone know what DC numbers might be reasonable to expect or should I say attainable by an amatur builder without the aid of a wind tunnel for a style similar to Jack"s Nebulas Theroem II or III
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00138.html (7,921 bytes)

2. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 06:34:21 -0500
Realisticaly .18 to.20. There are some better numbers out there, but without a tunnel its pure guess work. say attainable by an amatur builder without the aid of a wind tunnel for a style similar to
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00149.html (8,470 bytes)

3. RE: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:01:27 -0600
Good question. I'd like to know the answer to that question, too. Has anyone ever had any experience with any of the existing computer programs that do aerodynamic analysis? Maybe there is an area th
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00154.html (8,706 bytes)

4. RE: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:16:50 -0600
I think any programs available are either A: very high priced B: needing very high $ computers to run C: needing very high $ consultants to analyze the data John Robinson, Mechanician Mechanical Engi
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00155.html (9,151 bytes)

5. RE: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing <saltrat@pro-blend.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:47:08 -0600
For relatively simple analysis try: http://www.bgsoflex.com/auto.html aerodynamic and rolling hp loss calculation you can get to Cd if you have enough input data. It has been helpful to me. Skip ///
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00157.html (9,196 bytes)

6. RE: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing <saltrat@pro-blend.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:55:11 -0600
For relatively simple analysis try: http://www.bgsoflex.com/auto.html aerodynamic and rolling hp loss calculation you can get to Cd if you have enough input data. It has been helpful to me. Skip ///
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00158.html (9,315 bytes)

7. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 11:24:07 -0700
The EZ-Hook two wheeled streamliner is AERODYNAMICS FRONTAL AREA, 3.62 SQ. FT., DRAG COEFFICIENT .1007, so frontal area isnt everything, problem is we dont have wind tunnels to get the drag number do
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00166.html (9,404 bytes)

8. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 12:29:18 -0600
Howdy, running those numbers through the program at http://www.bgsoflex.com/auto.html comes up with the following : ( do they match any known HP numbers for the liner?) Air Density Computed is 0.0022
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00169.html (9,869 bytes)

9. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:28:34 -0500
I think i am going to build a virtual car.. CD is 5.0 but it doesn't matter as the area is all in my mind so the drag will still be 0 as the area is zero also.. weight what is the mass of a few neura
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00172.html (9,838 bytes)

10. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:37:43 -0600
I'm thinking I already have the Virtual Red Hat.... K -- <gridlen@yahoo.com>; land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net> matter as zero not much without should I for a /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net m
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00173.html (10,599 bytes)

11. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 13:44:37 -0600
I think that program may have a glitch in the "rolling resistance" module. Try varying onlt tire-pressure inputs and see if the results make any sense. (Like, from 70 to 90psi). Russ mack /// /// la
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00175.html (10,551 bytes)

12. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:48:43 -0800
Me thinks you all have been in the virtual Luxembourg Liquor way to many times. Could be that stuff has rotted Dalgrens mind and he is having strange visions of getting from A to B. Glen -- Original
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00176.html (11,618 bytes)

13. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 12:02:40 -0800
I agree. Bryan Savage /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe land-speed
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00178.html (8,554 bytes)

14. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:08:10 -0600
oh yeah, I put in 90 psi and it went thru the roof, 1195 hp required for rolling hp!!!! John Robinson, Mechanician Mechanical Engineering University of Wisconsin 1513 University Ave. Madison, Wi. 537
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00180.html (10,386 bytes)

15. Re: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 19:21:34 -0500
Well if I'm doing this program right it indicates that it took the Goldenrod 5000 HP to go 425 MPH. and I know that aint right. JB -- Original Message -- From: "Higginbotham Land Speed Racing" <saltr
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00189.html (9,590 bytes)

16. Fw: frontal area/drag coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "Marge and/or Dave Thomssen" <mdthom@radiks.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:16:11 -0600
I think there is a glitch in the rolling resistance for the same reason. I sent an Email to Bruce Bowling and he said he got the formula from a graph that only went up to 45 psi and he interpolated
/html/land-speed/2001-11/msg00192.html (11,004 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu