Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fuel\s+gauge\s+sending\s+unit\s+\-\s+BN2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fuel\s+gauge\s+sending\s+unit\s+\-\s+BN2\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. fuel gauge sending unit - BN2 (score: 1): Author: "Brashear, Jack, N" <JNBrashear@garverengineers.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:56:53 -0500; Hi All, my neighbor has had two faulty new sending units in a row from M+++ through a local supplier. His BN2 has the proper gauge and it checks out to be good using the information and procedures th; /html/healeys/2006-04/msg00215.html (7,365 bytes)
2. Re: fuel gauge sending unit - BN2 (score: 1): Author: "John Snyder" <helyjohn@cablespeed.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:08:04 -0700; I have had success w/ having the old sending unit rebuilt by Mo-Ma in Albuquerque MOMANM@aol.com . Also, at a Tech Session a few years ago, a vendor who is a local M+++ supplier said not to waste tim; /html/healeys/2006-04/msg00217.html (7,850 bytes)
3. RE: fuel gauge sending unit - BN2 (score: 1): Author: "Len and/or Marge" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:13:20 -0700; Jack: An assumption: you have bench tested the unit and it does not show the full range of resistance required for your sending unit. If it does test OK on the bench but the readings are off over the; /html/healeys/2006-04/msg00221.html (8,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]