Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fuse\s+\&\s+control\s+box\s+for\s+PA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fuse\s+\&\s+control\s+box\s+for\s+PA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. fuse & control box for PA (score: 1): Author: DSBonar@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 16:55:52 EDT; Can anyone confirm the correct fuse & control unit for PA 1823? Based on the inscription of my current unit, I have: RJF2 type L10 337 571 12 VER 10.34 Seems like in my reading, this is incorrect. C; /html/mg-mmm/2003-05/msg00047.html (7,396 bytes)
2. RE: fuse & control box for PA (score: 1): Author: "Gerhard Maier" <m.g.erhard@gmx.de>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 19:56:06 +0200; Hi Don, a old LUCAS Parts-List, of which I send you a extract by separate mail, tells that obviously the P-types had the same Control & Cut Out Box as the L, N and KN. It is a CJF2 / DA7 , number 336; /html/mg-mmm/2003-05/msg00052.html (9,073 bytes)
3. Re: fuse & control box for PA (score: 1): Author: "tom metcalf" <mgtom@bright.net>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:44:13 -0400; It seems to me the CJF2 was simply a CUT-OUT, junction, fuse box (CJF) while the RJF2 was a REGULATOR, cut-out,fuse box (RJF). I think they are identical externally. Further, the RJF2 should work wit; /html/mg-mmm/2003-05/msg00053.html (10,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]