Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*general\s+timing\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*general\s+timing\s+question\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. general timing question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 26 May 97 6:58:37 -24000; Continuing in the effort to get my Spit to run right: I'm dealing with the question of static timing an engine. I'd be grateful if someone out there who truly understands timing could answer a questi; /html/triumphs/1997-05/msg01585.html (7,000 bytes)
2. Re: general timing question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 08:04:26 -0700; Sean The cams were possibly a little different in these engines. But the main reason for the timing difference is that the older engines were timed with the vacuum advance disconnnected from the dist; /html/triumphs/1997-05/msg01595.html (8,252 bytes)
3. Re: general timing question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 14:37:12 -0400; Generally, when you static time something, you watch the points and can learn the exact moment the points open. So to static time something to 10 degrees BTDC, you fiddle around until you see the poi; /html/triumphs/1997-05/msg01604.html (8,197 bytes)
4. Re: general timing question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 15:29:02 -0400; is this really true? being mechanically challanged, i was under the impression that the mixture was controlled entirely in the carb. i know that running the wrong timing can be a bad thing, but i did; /html/triumphs/1997-05/msg01681.html (7,756 bytes)
5. Re: general timing question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 13:59:31 -0700; < snip > (from Brian) < snip > (from Michael) ** Michael, I think what Brian meant was, if you retard the advance too much fuel is still burning as it exits the exhaust and continues into the convert; /html/triumphs/1997-05/msg01694.html (7,632 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]