Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*grinding\s+cam\s+journals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*grinding\s+cam\s+journals\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:20:07 -0600; While looking through our pile of good cam cores for Susan's spitfire we have found we have a lot of the large journal cams that were used in the mk1/2 and 1500 spitfires. I know it is technically f; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00116.html (7,819 bytes)
2. Re: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: Bob Bownes <bownes@seiri.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:43:51 -0400; I'd be more inclined to have the blocks bored out. Larger journal = more bearing surface = less wear. What do you go through more of, blocks or cams? Would also guess the cam journals are hardened al; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00117.html (8,399 bytes)
3. RE: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: "tstrange@new.rr.com" <tstrange@new.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:27:52 -0400; Turning the journals down is an easy process. The expensive, & tricky part is putting the oil scroll into the journal, so oil is spread across the face of the bearing. Let me check, I may still have; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00118.html (8,648 bytes)
4. RE: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:16:27 -0700; Grinding the journals down is not that difficult, however itwill require a re-case hardening of the cam and it may be more reasonable in cost to just find a small journal cam. I have several of them; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00120.html (9,277 bytes)
5. Re: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:30:22 -0700; I don't see any problem at all with turning down the bearing diameter of the larger cam cores. If you want, having the camshaft parkerized will give a little more protection to the surfaces such as t; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00121.html (9,657 bytes)
6. RE: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:15:37 -0700; Paeco stuff sux. Brad, Grinding the journals down is not that difficult, however itwill require a re-case hardening of the cam and it may be more reasonable in cost to just find a small journal cam.; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00122.html (9,531 bytes)
7. RE: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:13:37 -0700; No reason not to. A decent machinist with the right gear can do about anything to a cam. They are castings with a surface hardening treatment. As long as the cam grinder uses some reasonable treatmen; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00123.html (9,037 bytes)
8. RE: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:31:00 -0700; Strange but true, larger journals are not automatically good for cams. They run on a film of oil with a load that pulses and tries to push the oil out. I've never understood why (you'd think the high; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00124.html (9,305 bytes)
9. Re: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:00:23 -0500; I got a LOT of good information on this one. I'd like to thank everyone that responded with suggestions and offers. Fortunately shortly after posting my note I managed to locate two small journal 13; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00130.html (10,681 bytes)
10. Re: grinding cam journals (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:14:15 -0500; Paeco machine work has proven to be shoddy, unreliable and undependable. And despite their warranty claim, they do not really stand behind their work ("Sure we'll fix our screwup, send it back at yo; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00134.html (7,518 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]