Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*intake\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. intake (score: 1)
Author: Zubrovka <zubrovka@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 07:26:17 -0600
Ok, now I have a question. One of the items I intend to change on my 76 B is the intake/exhaust. Most of the catalogs I've ever looked at push the webber downdraft carb and intake as "the best way",
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00177.html (7,238 bytes)

2. RE: intake (score: 1)
Author: "Ben Ruset" <ben.ruset@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:38:37 -0500
The weber looks like it is relatively simple to install, while the SU seems to be more complex. But I think people here have had better drivability with the dual SU's. Once they're set up, they don't
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00181.html (8,378 bytes)

3. RE: intake (score: 1)
Author: Bill Saidel <saidel@camden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 10:50:08 -0500
For those of you thinking about this exchange, why don't you ask the How many who exchanged the ZS for a Weber then changed again to the SU set-up and How many who exchanged the ZS for SU's then chan
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00183.html (8,996 bytes)

4. RE: intake (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 11:19:46 -0800
If a company sells you a Weber kit and a header, you pretty much have everything you need to convert the car so it will run kinda ok. To install twin SUs, you will need a used intake manifold, air f
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00198.html (8,532 bytes)

5. RE: Intake (score: 1)
Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:54:57 -0600
Go with the SUs. Down draft Webers loose it at high rpms, side draft at low rpms. (Or it's the other way around). Good SU's are trouble free, good at all rpm, and are very forgiving when it comes to
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00219.html (7,195 bytes)

6. RE: Intake (score: 1)
Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:57:34 -0600
I changed from ZS to SU's and am verysatisfied. I would not go to Weber's under any circumstances. On my 67, I put on HS6's that came from a Volvo, and without any changes to the needle, jet or sprin
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00221.html (7,167 bytes)

7. RE: Intake (score: 1)
Author: Zubrovka <zubrovka@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:08:58 -0600
Well. now if I can just remember what local junkyard I saw that twin carb B sitting in.... Thanks for all the replies. John /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00222.html (7,358 bytes)

8. Re: Intake (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:27:45 -0600
Lets add to that that DCOEs were developed for racing applications and suffer at low rpms because they are designed and tuned only for the top end. They are a poor choice for a daily driver unless yo
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00223.html (8,232 bytes)

9. Re: Intake (score: 1)
Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:16:19 EST
Not so, grasshopper! Webers were designed for both road and racing use, on Italian cars. The sad fact is that when you buy a new one, it comes jetted for some standard application - usually a Fiat or
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00235.html (8,502 bytes)

10. RE: Intake (score: 1)
Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:52:20 -0600
I have no idea what cam, etc. is in the car. I bought it as a project. When I found this pair of HS6's at a garage sale ($5 for the pair) I couldn't resist, since I wanted to put the HS4's on my 78.
/html/mgs/2002-03/msg00263.html (7,251 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu