Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*junk\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*junk\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. junk (score: 1): Author: "David Porter" <Frogeye@swcp.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:54:00 -0700; My question is, at what point does the number of blocked sender addresses start to affect the performance of the program? I have about a million now and more everyday. <G> Dave frogeye@swcp.com Porte; /html/healeys/2007-01/msg00103.html (6,747 bytes)
2. RE: junk (score: 1): Author: John Sims <ahbn6@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:59:18 -0500; That is one of my points. IF you get a new email address and restrict it to those you trust, you should not have to keep a block list. It takes months AND releasing your address willy-nilly to start; /html/healeys/2007-01/msg00104.html (7,144 bytes)
3. Re: junk (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:18:17 -0800; "It takes months AND releasing your address willy-nilly to start getting spam again. " Not necessarily. If anybody you've emailed has your address stored in their contacts list (many do this automat; /html/healeys/2007-01/msg00105.html (8,350 bytes)
4. Re: junk (score: 1): Author: "Len and/or Marge" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:58:05 -0800; I am computer-challenged when it comes to the technical aspects of these ( @#$%^ ) wonderful devices. I do note, however, that the majority of the spam that I receive is 'modified' and therefore gets; /html/healeys/2007-01/msg00107.html (7,227 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]