Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*lap\s+time\s+groupings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*lap\s+time\s+groupings\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: Ccanepa50@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:56:03 EST; our club in norcal has been doing this "grouping by lap time stuff" for a while and I personally have enjoyed it as such, and in the overall it makes for some great nose to tail racing......however,; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00035.html (7,677 bytes)
2. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: S800Racer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:51:56 EST; << it gets a little unnerving on a handling track when a "fast lil' ol' sprite" (substitute elva...TR3...Alpha...MG...etc) has to go against a 67 mustang or a 'vette coupe type car with marginal rear; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00037.html (7,364 bytes)
3. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:17:02 -0500; This is why I don't run in races that are grouped by lap time rather than displacement class. You get big cars with no handling and huge acceleration out with nimble cars that handle great and have n; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00039.html (8,052 bytes)
4. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 06:19:38 -0600; I always thought that the way the SCCA did it was not perfect, but it was the best. They classified cars by "performance potential", so generally, similar cars ran against each other. I've kind of pu; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00043.html (9,140 bytes)
5. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:04:52 EST; << It's unnerving because it is unsafe! The size differential is a very good reason not to set up run group based on lap times alone. >> Yes Doug, we have found that similar size rather than similar; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00044.html (7,238 bytes)
6. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: "Ron Schonscheck" <schonny@y2consult.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:50:28 -0700; Why not separate the groups by size/weight then and still use relative lap times? It is sort of done now, big bore small bore? Might have to think "outside the box" a little though? 'vette invisible; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00047.html (10,216 bytes)
7. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: "Richard E. Buckingham, Jr." <rebjrmd@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 10:11:24 -0800; 1. Some cars achieve their lap times through rapid acceleration and top speed while others do so by having superior handling, light weight and more efficient brakes. Obviously putting Corvettes out; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00051.html (9,402 bytes)
8. Re: lap time groupings (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:26:44 EST; Have to agree with Dick on this one. I have helped to arrange races and the time you can waste listening to people giving you their argument for moving them down a class can be staggering. Exceptions; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00052.html (8,692 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]