Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mallory\s+dist\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mallory\s+dist\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. mallory dist (score: 1): Author: RJunkermei@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:17:27 -0500; Hi Maybe some one can enlighten me on why all the listings for mallory dual point distributors say except tr250 and tr6 ive seen somewhere that a jag dist is the same any thoughts thanks Rick; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00115.html (7,107 bytes)
2. RE: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:58:41 -0800; The diameter of the body is too large to clear the block. You run into the same problem with Spitfire blocks. Kelvin.; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00116.html (7,597 bytes)
3. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "DLDEAD" <DLDEAD@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:14:45 -0700; Hi Rick, I have run a Malloy Jag. dist for the last 8 or more yrs. First duel point then electronic. Dan in Denver; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00117.html (7,347 bytes)
4. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "DLDEAD" <DLDEAD@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:34:53 -0700; Sorry Rick & all. The dist. is in a GT-6. Dan; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00118.html (7,389 bytes)
5. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "Robert Dardano" <19to1tr6@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:53:51 -0500; I thought the Mallory was not listed for the 6 because it did not have the tack off for the mech. tac. I checked with Moss tec a year or so ago,on this but other wise would work-- I think Bob Lang ru; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00122.html (8,054 bytes)
6. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: Gt6steve@aol.com; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 21:27:25 EST; <PRE>The Jag Mallory works a treat on the Six. Mine is about nine years old absolutely no issues. For the GT6 you've got to use the TR Lucas distributor clamp and maybe the mount??? but it's an easy; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00123.html (7,584 bytes)
7. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@autox.team.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:52:30 -0700 (MST); I've been using a Mallory dual point for years on the Killer Spit. I'm trying to remember where I origanlly got it, but it was first used on my old Datsun 620 pickup. To put it in the Spit I had to t; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00124.html (7,735 bytes)
8. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:21:36 -0700; I can't see how the Mallory Dual Point Distributor can possibly beat the MSD ignition that I was using on the Spit before I changed to the Honda Power. Using the Pertronix as a trigger gets rid of mo; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00125.html (8,256 bytes)
9. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:21:18 -0500 (EST); Ther _may_ be two reasons for the listing saying that this dizzy is not for TR250/TR6. First, there's no tach drive. Second, the dizzy's don't have any vac. advance/retard. So, they are technically n; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00126.html (9,034 bytes)
10. RE: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:37:50 -0800; While lots of people like to keep mechanical tachs for originality's sake, I'd point out that the one that came with your car wasn't made for an engine with hot cam, lightened flywheel, higher compre; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00128.html (10,386 bytes)
11. RE: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:03:55 -0700; This in-car video from March of last year during an ASRA race group practice session by Paul Bonham (Porsche 944 running in SCCA ITE and currently ranked 1st of ten cars in class) starts on the front; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00129.html (8,521 bytes)
12. RE: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:59:56 -0800; Thanks Fred, and my apologies to the FOT list for posting inaccurate Quoting an old cliche; "it's a good day to learn!" After years of propogating the incorrect information, I'll do something positiv; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00131.html (8,565 bytes)
13. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:39:41 -0500; When I had my TR3 motor on the dyno last year, it made the same power and torque with the Mallory dual point as it did with an MSD box. The money I saved from not going out and buying the MSD box pai; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00136.html (8,758 bytes)
14. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:58:21 -0700; Are the Mallory Dual Point Distributors that inexpensive? Last I looked the Spitfire one was going for over $400. The MSD 6AL That I was using is selling for under $200 and is equipped with a built-; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00137.html (9,477 bytes)
15. Re: mallory dist (score: 1): Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:08:40 -0500; I have had the Mallory since 1998 and paid under $200 for it. I had tried a Crane box with it in 1998 and it was the only DNF that I had that year. Took the box out and returned it to Jegs for a full; /html/fot/2003-01/msg00155.html (10,615 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]