Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mazda\s+rotary\s+engine\s+factor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mazda\s+rotary\s+engine\s+factor\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:20:33 -0500; I did not even mention in my last reply what the issue really is with the mazda rotary factor. It is currently engine displacement times 3 for the class it has to run in. This does not represent how; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00543.html (9,640 bytes)
2. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:43:11 -0500; Gary thanks for replying. The two strokes I agree on completely no question on that. Displacement X 2 as they process twice as much air and fuel as a 4 stroke engine of equal displacement in 2 revs.; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00588.html (15,515 bytes)
3. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 17:02:38 -0800; Dave and all; To the best of my knowledge 2 stroke engines have always been classed by the same bore x bore x .7854 x stroke x number of cylinders. Or Pi R squared X stroke X number of cylinders. The; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00593.html (17,574 bytes)
4. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Chuck Rothfuss <crothfuss@coastalnet.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 20:26:18 -0500; Whoa, if I was an outsider (non rotor-head) looking at this thread I'd really be confused. Let me try to simplify things a bit for the lists benefit. Okay, it seems that there's one thing that's the; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00598.html (9,004 bytes)
5. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: "Ed Van Scoy" <edvs@uswest.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:53:15 -0700; What is wrong with just putting rotary engines in their own class, instead of trying to get them to fit in an established class (otto) that may or may not be equal? You could just add an "R" to the; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00601.html (17,732 bytes)
6. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: tim schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 22:07:49 -0500; How does SCTA calculate disp. for 2-cycle,as below or ? Tim Schoeny; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00603.html (18,910 bytes)
7. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 07:39:37 -0500; Are rules in SCTA based on fact or opinion then ? As you say you are standing by your opinion rather than the facts. Your opinion is based on total volume not swept volume per rev.. I fear you have t; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00610.html (20,190 bytes)
8. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 07:16:53 -0500; To all, I would like to publicly apologize to Gary Allen if I insulted him it was not the point of the message that was sent.. I was a pleading for some understanding on the physics of how something; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00611.html (26,040 bytes)
9. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:27 -0500; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00614.html (18,867 bytes)
10. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:17:39 -0700; Gary, David others. I truly am waiting to see how this resolves, with the hope that the rules committee present a much more thorough representation based on emperical engineering principle. This dial; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00622.html (23,526 bytes)
11. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:49:15 EST; I was involved w/ a 2 rotor souped up, Mazda on gas, a professional dyno indicated 195hp. Whats the big deal?; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00623.html (8,157 bytes)
12. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:54:19 -0500; i have been involved with many and they make more than that if done correctly to race specs. they will and have made 350 to 360 on gas no turbo..the same as any other good 2600 cc engine.. 1308 X2 =2; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00625.html (8,318 bytes)
13. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Chuck Rothfuss <crothfuss@coastalnet.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 19:21:16 -0500; Great question. There is certainly a "breathing efficiency" issue when comparing Wankel engines to their piston kin. Although both share the same four Otto Cycle events, (Cycle being a better term t; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00635.html (10,692 bytes)
14. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 19:18:39 -0600; Now Chuck that was interesting.... it was under the RC cycle something or Very cool deal you can watch this thing work... I have tried to understand this thing and until that demonstration I am not s; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00638.html (11,918 bytes)
15. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: "The Backus's" <34ford@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 21:07:58 -0500; Why can't we all just get along? JB in record setting cold Cincy -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> To: <land-speed@autox.team.net> Cc: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electroren; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00644.html (27,994 bytes)
16. Re: mazda rotary engine factor (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:41:06 -0500; If you get into breathing efficiency then you have to start with hemi vs wedge 2 valve 4 valve 5 valve SOHC DOHC it get endless. Sort of pick your own poison on the breathing thing. The wankle has no; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00649.html (11,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]