Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mgs\@autox\.team\.net\s+e\-mail\s+delay\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mgs\@autox\.team\.net\s+e\-mail\s+delay\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. mgs@autox.team.net e-mail delay (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 22:44:14 -0400 (EDT); Hello there, I got one of my posts from over a week ago as if it were new mail. Anyone else noticed this? I think this has happen to me a couple of times lately. R. Johnson - Dallas '90 Maine Coon '7; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg00315.html (6,833 bytes)
2. Re: mgs@autox.team.net e-mail delay (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 08:48:20 -0400 (EDT); Yes, this happens to me on a fairly regular basis. Quite often, I have received several responses to the post before I get the initial post. Dan Masters, Alcoa, TN '71 TR6--3000mile/year driver, full; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg00351.html (7,433 bytes)
3. Re: mgs@autox.team.net e-mail delay (score: 1): Author: mgbob@juno.com (ROBERT G. HOWARD); Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 09:05:58 EDT; I have noticed this also.; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg00352.html (7,680 bytes)
4. Re: mgs@autox.team.net e-mail delay (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 10:03:26 -0400 (EDT); Got your reply, no problem. I wonder what makes the difference? R. Johnson - Dallas; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg00359.html (6,811 bytes)
5. Re: mgs@autox.team.net e-mail delay (score: 1): Author: britcars@juno.com (Lawrence J Alexander); Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 13:35:21 EDT; Sooooo glad to hear that it wasn't happening only to me! I was beginning to think that working on pre-1981 cars had brought about some kind of time-warp in the shop.... Lawrie British Sportscar Cente; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg00367.html (7,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]